/* * Patch for filter_var() */ if(!function_exists('filter_var')){ define('FILTER_VALIDATE_IP', 'ip'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV4', 'ipv4'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV6', 'ipv6'); define('FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL', 'email'); define('FILTER_FLAG_EMAIL_UNICODE', 'unicode'); function filter_var($variable, $filter, $option = false){ if($filter == 'ip'){ if($option == 'ipv4'){ if(preg_match("/(\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } if($option == 'ipv6'){ if(preg_match("/\s*(([:.]{0,7}[0-9a-fA-F]{0,4}){1,8})\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } if($filter == 'email'){ if($option == 'unicode' || $option == false){ if(preg_match("/\s*(\S*@\S*\.\S*)\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } } }
The available data are compatible with the interpretation that a specific beef factor, suspected to be one or more thermoresistant potentially oncogenic bovine viruses (e.g., polyoma-, papilloma- or possibly single-stranded DNA viruses) may contaminate beef preparations and lead to latent infections in the colorectal tract. Preceding, concomitant or subsequent exposure to chemical carcinogens arising during cooking procedures should result in increased risk for colorectal cancer synergistic with these infections.So it's still the cooking that messes up. Such a virus infection without exposure to carcinogens produced by cooking won't lead to an increased risk of cancer, according to the abstract.
Here's the original paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22212999 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22212999)So it's still the cooking that messes up. Such a virus infection without exposure to carcinogens produced by cooking won't lead to an increased risk of cancer, according to the abstract.Sounds logical.
... so the claim re raw beef and cancer is clearly wrong.
Please put all such topics in the Hot Topics forum in future. Moved there now.
Sorry, but this is an extreme oversimplification.You are missing the point. The point I made was that studies have shown LOWER rates of cancer after reducing average cooking temperatures(or higher rates of cancer if cooking temperatures were increased). I did not state that cancer-rates were reduced to 0 after eating only raw foods.
As you know, animals in the wild can also get cancer, while eating a life-long 100% raw food diet. That shows that other factors beside cooking can be involved.
Löwenherz
The "Hot Topics forum" is for NON-RAW topics, right?No, the Hot Topics forum is for any topics which are anti-rawpalaeo in theme. Non-dietary related topics go in the Off-Topics forum.
This is a not a non-raw topic.
Lol,
Löwenherz
You are missing the point. The point I made was that studies have shown LOWER rates of cancer after reducing average cooking temperatures(or higher rates of cancer if cooking temperatures were increased). I did not state that cancer-rates were reduced to 0 after eating only raw foods.
No, the Hot Topics forum is for any topics which are anti-rawpalaeo in theme. Non-dietary related topics go in the Off-Topics forum.
No, the Hot Topics forum is for any topics which are anti-rawpalaeo in theme. Non-dietary related topics go in the Off-Topics forum.Somehow we seem to have this problem in half the topics that apparently belong in this section. This is a "raw paleo" forum so "non/anti raw paleo" topics are off topic but should be placed in the hot topics section? Confusing. Sounds like the hot topic section should be called "non rpd" (for non raw paleo dietary stuff) and the off topic section should be called "non dietary topics".
You wrote: "..so the claim re raw beef and cancer is clearly wrong."I showed previously that many studies demonstrate that increasing cooking temperatures increases the rate of cancer, and so on, so that it is highly likely that I am correct.
And I ask you: HOW do YOU know??
You don't have ANY proof that the connection is "clearly wrong".
Nevertheless, you are free to think and speculate what you want.
Löwenherz
Citing critical articles is not necessarily "anti-rawpaleo".The intention is to discuss anti-rawpalaeo topics. That is why it is called the "Hot Topics" forum. "Hot" meaning that the topics are illegal or dangerous or too controversial to be placed in other forums. This topic is definitely too controversial.
BTW: Here is the forum description on the main page: "Hot Topics, Discussions of non-RAF/non- raw topics. Raw vegan and Fruitarian topics may be discussed here but only here., Moderator: djr_81"
Löwenherz