/* * Patch for filter_var() */ if(!function_exists('filter_var')){ define('FILTER_VALIDATE_IP', 'ip'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV4', 'ipv4'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV6', 'ipv6'); define('FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL', 'email'); define('FILTER_FLAG_EMAIL_UNICODE', 'unicode'); function filter_var($variable, $filter, $option = false){ if($filter == 'ip'){ if($option == 'ipv4'){ if(preg_match("/(\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } if($option == 'ipv6'){ if(preg_match("/\s*(([:.]{0,7}[0-9a-fA-F]{0,4}){1,8})\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } if($filter == 'email'){ if($option == 'unicode' || $option == false){ if(preg_match("/\s*(\S*@\S*\.\S*)\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } } }
Even though the acidity of fruit increases as it ripens, the higher acidity level does not make the fruit seem tarter, which can lead to the misunderstanding that the riper the fruit the sweeter. This curious fact is attributed to the Brix-Acid Ratio.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripening (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripening)
Did you know that fermented beverages, specifically ethanol containing beverages were a crucial componant of most indigenous and traditional health strategies? Or that those who drink a moderate amount of ethanol live longer than those who drink heavily or don’t drink at all?
Of course the beverages fermented by native peoples and by our traditional cultural forebearers were much healthier and nutritionally viable than those of today, created with local ingredients and wild yeasts, and were not filtered and pasturized like the ones that most of us were raised around. Turning simple sugars into ethanol, amino acids, and B complex vitamins, not to mention a culturally and ritually significant inebriant is a nearly ubiquitous human behavior, and part of what holds the fabric of traditional societies together. ....
P.S. (You're) probably wondering what “a moderate amount of alcohol” is. Studies indicate that 1 – 3 drinks ethanol drinks per day seems to extend lifespans! Here is a review from the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology showing the effects of alcohol on life span! (Alcohol and mortality: A review,
http://www.jclinepi.com/article/0895-4356(94)00174-O/abstract (http://www.jclinepi.com/article/0895-4356(94)00174-O/abstract))
Wild Fermented Hard Cider
http://www.danielvitalis.com/tag/health/ (http://www.danielvitalis.com/tag/health/)
Alcohol-Related Morbidity and Mortality
http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/arh27-1/39-51.pdf (http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/arh27-1/39-51.pdf)
"a certain pattern of regular light-to-moderate drinking may have beneficial effects on coronary heart disease"
Alcohol and Health: The J-Shaped Curve
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/562474_2 (http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/562474_2)
The health effects of ethanol are dependent on the amount of alcohol consumed and the pattern of drinking. Most studies report J-shaped curves, whereby light to moderate drinkers have less risk than abstainers, and heavy drinkers are at the highest risk. A recent meta-analysis of over 1 million individuals showed that consumption of 1 drink daily by women and 1 or 2 drinks daily by men was associated with a reduction in total mortality of 18%.[2] On the other hand, intakes of >2 drinks daily in women and 3 drinks daily in men were associated with increased mortality in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 1).
Alcohol consumption and mortality from all causes, coronary heart disease, and stroke: results from a prospective cohort study of Scottish men with 21 years of follow up
http://www.bmj.com/content/318/7200/1725.full (http://www.bmj.com/content/318/7200/1725.full)
Risk for all cause mortality was similar for non-drinkers and men drinking up to 14 units a week. Mortality risk then showed a graded association with alcohol consumption
One of the most contentious issues in the vast literature about alcohol consumption has been the consistent finding that those who don't drink tend to die sooner than those who do. The standard Alcoholics Anonymous explanation for this finding is that many of those who show up as abstainers in such research are actually former hard-core drunks who had already incurred health problems associated with drinking.
But a new paper in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research suggests that — for reasons that aren't entirely clear — abstaining from alcohol does tend to increase one's risk of dying, even when you exclude former problem drinkers. The most shocking part? Abstainers' mortality rates are higher than those of heavy drinkers.
Why Do Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers?
By John Cloud Monday, Aug. 30, 2010
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017200,00.html#ixzz1rM9r02zt (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017200,00.html#ixzz1rM9r02zt)
In toxicology, hormesis is a dose response phenomenon characterized by a low dose stimulation, high dose inhibition, resulting in either a J-shaped or an inverted U-shaped dose response. Such environmental factors that would seem to produce positive responses have also been termed “eustress”.
The hormesis model of dose response is vigorously debated.[1] The notion that hormesis is a widespread or important phenomenon in biological systems is not widely accepted.[2]
The biochemical mechanisms by which hormesis works are not well understood. It is conjectured that low doses of toxins or other stressors might activate the repair mechanisms of the body. The repair process fixes not only the damage caused by the toxin, but also other low-level damage that might have accumulated before without triggering the repair mechanism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis)
Since Southam and Erlich’s paper, thousands of other examples of compounds exhibiting hormetic effects have been documented. Some of these are well-recognized components of our diet–including trace metals, alcohol and caffeine–recognized to be essential or healthful at low doses, but detrimental or toxic at high doses. - Todd Becker, Hormesis, http://gettingstronger.org/hormesis/ (http://gettingstronger.org/hormesis/)
The popular image is of Johnny Appleseed spreading apple seeds randomly, everywhere he went. In fact, he planted nurseries rather than orchards, built fences around them to protect them from livestock, left the nurseries in the care of a neighbor who sold trees on shares, and returned every year or two to tend the nursery. Though apples grown from seed are rarely sweet or tasty, Apple orchards with sour apples were popular among the settlers because apples were mainly used for producing hard cider and apple jack.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Appleseed (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Appleseed)
(M)oderate consumption of fermented fruit, as in wine or hard cider, may actually provide more health benefits than eating fruit in its unadulterated forms, according to research from Harvard Medical School. The Harvard researchers suspect it may have something to do with the fact that, when apples are turned into hard cider or grapes into wine, we get extra benefits from the skins, stems, seeds, and husks, and perhaps even the oak in which the alcohol is aged. Plus, hard ciders have less alcohol than wine and other spirits; the levels range from 2.5 percent alcohol by volume to as much as 8.5 percent (about the same as beer), compared with wine, which averages about 11 percent, and spirits, which start at 15 percent.
HARD APPLE CIDER
The Better Holiday Cocktail
If an apple a day keeps the doctor away, an apple cider cocktail could keep him away for life.
BY AMY AHLBERG
http://www.rodale.com/hard-apple-cider (http://www.rodale.com/hard-apple-cider)
Drink to this(Articles excerpted for fair use purposes of discussion and learning, not copied in full to avoid copyright issues. You can go to the sources to get the full articles.)
Evidence grows about benefits of moderate drinking
By Maggie Rosen, Globe Correspondent | April 6, 2004
http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2004/04/06/drink_to_this/?page=full (http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2004/04/06/drink_to_this/?page=full)
A story on the Sunday night TV show, "60 Minutes," was the turning point.
Before that, for at least 2,000 years, people claimed alcohol had medicinal benefits, but no one knew for sure. In the dozen years since the show aired, scientists around the world have been looking at alcohol's upside, and their findings have been consistent: Drinking in moderation appears healthier than not drinking at all.
The show, which said this link might explain why French people have less heart disease than Americans, made it politically acceptable to talk about the pluses of alcohol and encouraged researchers to explore the health consequences of drinking, a number of scientists said.
Dr. Harvey Finkel, then a Boston University School of Medicine professor, said he didn't believe it at first: How could something that so clearly destroyed people's lives and their health possibly be good for them? But after years of examining the data, Finkel said he changed his mind. Now, in his retirement, he lectures about the health benefits of drinking a glass or two of wine or beer with dinner.
The key distinction that Finkel and other doctors and scientists make about drinking is the definition of "moderation." They are strongly against drinking to get drunk, or drinking and driving. They suggest people eat while they drink to mitigate against drunkenness. But they believe that most people who can handle their liquor would do themselves a favor by sipping wine or beer every day.
"Responsible drinking may actually prevent the common diseases of old age," said Dr. R. Curtis Ellison, professor of medicine and public Health at the Boston University School of Medicine. "The mortality rate [among moderate drinkers] is 20 percent lower and the rate of heart disease 40 percent lower than in abstainers with similar behavior and [physical] characteristics."
Over the last dozen years, in dozens of epidemiological studies examining tens of thousands of patient records, researchers have noted a link between moderate drinking and better health. Repeated studies from all over the world have shown that people who consume moderate amounts of alcohol have lower risk of heart disease, stroke, lung disease, diabetes, dementia, and maybe even obesity.
Not everyone is convinced. There has never been and may never be the gold-standard study -- a randomized, double-blind test, giving some people a placebo and others an alcoholic punch. Researchers say it would be nearly impossible to get someone to fund a study that made people drink.
....
Scientists now believe that alcohol encourages production of "good" HDL-cholesterol, helps wash the gunk out of the lining of blood vessels and reins in "free radicals," which can damage cells, causing heart disease, cancer, and other problems. Researchers are beginning to examine the psychological benefits of having a relaxing glass of wine or mug of beer with dinner.
Until recently, most alcohol research focused on the health benefits of red wine. One British physician, Dr. William McCrea of the Great Western Hospital in Swindon, found that a specific Chilean wine -- Montes Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve 2001 -- helped prevent blood clotting and cholesterol buildup in the blood vessels of cardiac patients.
But the focus has now expanded to include white wine, dark beer, cider and spirits, which all seem to confer roughly the same benefit. It's not yet clear whether the health boost comes from the skins, stems, seeds, husks or even the oak in which alcohol is aged, though researchers are searching for those answers. The fermentation appears to be crucial; grape juice does not extend lifespans as one recent Harvard Medical School study suggests alcohol might.
Dark beer contains antioxidants, as well as high levels of important dietary minerals such as chromium, which may help control blood glucose levels, and silicon, which may help with bone health.
Research also implies that hard cider, "colored" spirits like whisky, and to a lesser extent white wine, have the same polyphenols and flavonoids found in red wine, and so provide the same antioxidant and anti-inflammatory benefits. Flavonoids are what give many fruits and vegetables their dark color.
Not all alcohol conveys equal benefit: Light beers and "white spirits" like gin and vodka don't appear to contain any health-giving ingredients.
And drinking is obviously not for everyone. Doctors and researchers agree that anyone with a previous history of abuse, a dislike for alcohol, contrary religious beliefs, or who is on medication that is incompatible with alcohol should not drink.
Different people respond to alcohol differently. A recent study out of Tufts University suggests that for people with certain genetic mutations, alcohol consumption may actually boost their bad cholesterol instead of the good, potentially making them sicker instead of healthier.
"There are no external symptoms, and we have no way of knowing who has this without doing genetic testing," said Jose M. Ordovas, a senior scientist at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. "The message is that no single recommendation can fit everyone, and until we have more efficient ways of doing personalized therapy, its dangerous to generalize."
Responsible, moderate drinking means not driving, drinking with meals when the food dilutes the "tipsying" effect of alcohol, and not drinking a weekly quota all at once, Ellison and other scientists said.
"You cannot save your `drink a day' all week and then have seven drinks on Saturday night," Ellison said.
Finkel said it's still harder than it should be to convince Puritanical Americans that drinking might be healthy.
There are people, Finkel said, "who can't accept the idea that even one drop of alcohol could possibly be good for you."
Good for what ails you
(The article goes on to say that drinking alcohol in moderation has been correlated in studies with reduced risk of Heart disease, Lung disease, Type 2 (adult onset) diabetes, Osteoporosis, Dementia, and Obesity.)
did you know that all of the apples in our modern diet are genetic clones? It’s true, the apple tree as we think of it is a grafted plant, and its fruit is exceptionally hybridized. This is so strange because we tend to, as a culture, consider the apple the very symbol of “natural food”. Not so!One possible reason why wild fruits are less prone to mold than domesticated fruits is that wild fruits contain higher levels of the defense chemicals, variously described as polyphenols, phytonutrients, and antioxidants, that the plants use to kill molds in the wild and that have also been found to provide health benefits when consumed in whole form in moderate quantities in studies. So a when fruit molds readily, it may be a sign that the fruit is less beneficial than varieties that are closer to wild forms.
http://www.danielvitalis.com/tag/apples/ (http://www.danielvitalis.com/tag/apples/)
Different people respond to alcohol differently. A recent study out of Tufts University suggests that for people with certain genetic mutations, alcohol consumption may actually boost their bad cholesterol instead of the good, potentially making them sicker instead of healthier.
"There are no external symptoms, and we have no way of knowing who has this without doing genetic testing," said Jose M. Ordovas, a senior scientist at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. "The message is that no single recommendation can fit everyone, and until we have more efficient ways of doing personalized therapy, its dangerous to generalize."
from The Wine of Astonishment Why Drinking Wine Gets You Drunk
by Robert Walters
http://www.finewinemag.com/docs/22%20WaltersAstonishment.pdf (http://www.finewinemag.com/docs/22%20WaltersAstonishment.pdf)
the research we have thus far suggests that our ancestors regularly consumed alcohol as a part of their fruit-rich diet. ... hungry frugivores are unlikely to turn up their noses at fruit on the forest floor when nothing else is on offer. in short, it’s clear that great apes, and we can include early humans here, would regularly consume reasonable quantities of ethanol through their consumption of overripe fruits. ...
Dudley believes that the ability to smell the fumes of ethanol given off by very ripe fruit, and to be attracted to this smell, would have been (and probably still is) an advantage in the wild. It would enable the fruit-eater not only to find edible food, but to find the most nutritious fruits—those highest in calories and easiest to digest. In fact, ethanol is itself very high in calories (almost twice that of carbohydrates), so the attraction to alcohol would have had very real nutritional benefits to our ancestors and may therefore have led to a natural selection favoring those primates who liked a bit of a tipple. Alcohol consumption may also have had advantages as an appetite stimulant, and because being tipsy can lead to more social interaction, closer bonding and greater procreation may have resulted. Then there are the recent studies linking moderate alcohol consumption to reduced mortality and disease in humans. Do primates also live longer and suffer less disease if they consume alcohol? ...
... The pentailed treeshrew (in fact a small primate) was shown “frequently [to] consume alcohol doses […] that would intoxicate humans.” The fact that treeshrews go back in the fossil record some 14 million years, and are considered the least-changed living descendants of our primate ancestors, led Wiens to conclude “that exposure to potentially harmful alcohol levels was probably significant early on in the evolution of several mammalian lineages, including […] primates.” ...
It may well be that those wild ancestors of ours who were most attracted to alcohol (and its effects) did best nutritionally, reduced their stress levels, and were therefore more likely to survive and prosper. They were more likely to procreate, to have healthy babies, and to pass down their alcohol-loving genes to them. ...
We shouldn’t forget that the ancients were getting smashed long before wine arrived on the scene. It’s highly likely, based on the archeological evidence we have today, that fermented milk products, cider, mead (fermented honey-based liquor), and other alcohols were invented and widely used before the discovery of grape wine. This makes it even less likely that wine made from grapes was an accidental discovery. Our ancient ancestors had many practical uses for alcoholic beverages, including healing, nutrition,4 ritual, and worship, as a clean safe beverage when water was often not, false courage before battle, a source of inspiration, and even a useful tool in decisionmaking (or did Laurence sterne make this up?). Of course, it was also a commodity and a social lubricant. The significance of alcoholic beverages and their effects in our history can hardly be overstated. For example, it has been argued that humans first began farming not to produce food, which was, relatively speaking, widely available, but to grow crops that produced alcoholic beverages.
Thanks Phil for the videos. I was laughing out loud at seeing animals having a "keg party".You're welcome, Dorothy. I also love the story about the orangutans fermenting durian fruit into a mildly alcoholic food too. It's fascinating that intentional "wine"-making predates the human race.
I bet it's pretty individual how much anyone can drink and still have it be a good thing and for people that are alcoholics or who have been alcoholics - I bet that abstaining completely would be best.There's also a vast difference between natural, wild raw fermented foods vs. industrially manufactured alcoholic beverages.
There's a movie on netflix called "beer" that credits beer with extraordinary things including the advent of agriculture.Yes, I mentioned that above, but I see the advent of monoculture agriculture as more of a negative thing, healthwise, than something meriting credit. I don't drink or advocate beer. I've found artisinal mead and unpasteurized sake to be much less problematic for me than beer. I suspect that I wouldn't handle even unpasteurized ale (real ale, aka cask ale) very well, due to gluten content and my low tolerance for grains in general. I might give it a try some day, though.
One of the things Brian also said was that he had read that a lot of the research saying that a couple of drinks a day was funded by the alcohol industry so you have to be really careful to make sure that no one doing the research has something to gain by particular results.Yup, the study reported in Time Magazine that I linked to above (Late-Life Alcohol Consumption and 20-Year Mortality http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017200,00.html#ixzz203Ku7eMb (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017200,00.html#ixzz203Ku7eMb)) was "funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and the Department of Veterans Affairs." (http://www.disabled-world.com/fitness/moderate-drinking.php#ixzz203aakahm (http://www.disabled-world.com/fitness/moderate-drinking.php#ixzz203aakahm)). I doubt that they were happy with the results, which makes them all the more credible. The study "controlled for confounding factors such as previous problem drinking" (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100824161432.htm (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100824161432.htm)). However, the studies on alcohol consumption have all been observational studies, from which we can't draw conclusions. The best they can do is suggest inferences to investigate with further study.
Even though heavy drinking is associated with higher risk for cirrhosis and several types of cancer (particularly cancers in the mouth and esophagus), heavy drinkers are less likely to die than people who don't drink, even if they never had a problem with alcohol.Of course, the key correlating factor for optimal lifespan was moderating intake, which some people find unmanageable with alcoholic beverages. And as with everything, buyer beware and YMMV, so I'm not advocating anything for other people, just pondering this stuff and checking for what other folks have found. The orangutan article was particularly interesting.
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017200,00.html#ixzz203Ku7eMb (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017200,00.html#ixzz203Ku7eMb)
The research was not done on raw paleos obviously - so this information on many different species matched with our long history with alcohol as a species means more to me actually than the modern research.Yes, same here.
Oh - and of course - natural vs chemicalized versions - 2 totally separate things to me.Quite right. All alcoholic beverages are not the same.
the bad news is that it has "coconut flavors" and stevia in itYeah, it's not perfect. They do claim that it's "raw," though.
the different bottles with flavors like pomegranate were less natural.Yes, I don't drink those.
I was thinking though that it might be a good starter for some fresh coconut milk/water.I might try that, though according to a source that Chris Kresser linked to, coconut water doesn't ferment as readily, nor the culture live as long, as in other media, like sugar-water or maple-syrup-water. Apparently, people who ferment coconut water tend to add kefir culture from sugar-water to it.
I was thinking though that fermented coconut milk compared to regular coconut milk might similar to honey compared to fermented honey or grapes compared to wine - might become a very different kind of experience and might help one to relax rather than pace.
Are there traditional fermented alcoholic drinks using coconuts?There's tuak in the Philippines, which is made from coconut tree sap and is further distilled into arrack: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrack#Coconut_arrack (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrack#Coconut_arrack)