Print Page - Aajonus e-mail re rawesome-further update
Paleo Diet: Raw Paleo Diet and Lifestyle Forum
Other Raw-Animal-Food Diets (eg:- Primal Diet/Raw Version of Weston-Price Diet etc.) => Primal Diet => Topic started by: TylerDurden on June 08, 2012, 01:47:52 am
Title: Aajonus e-mail re rawesome-further update
Post by: TylerDurden on June 08, 2012, 01:47:52 am
* Very Important - Defending Healthy Food Freedom or Defending Food Criminals? Aajonus Vonderplan?itz
From: aajonus (optimal@earthlink.net) Sent: 07 June 2012 18:34:44 To: aajonus (optimal@earthlink.net)
Hi, healthy-food lovers, I began actively fighting to keep raw milk on store shelves in 1971 when California State government health officials began another campaign to rob us of our raw-milk access and freedom. For me, drinking raw milk was not merely a choice of the richest and most flavorful food on the planet but a matter of life and death. When I did not have it, I suffered so much more. After the radiation treatments deteriorated the bone around my teeth and my teeth dangled in my gums and I bleed from them almost constantly, drinking raw milk restored the bone around my teeth within one year. That was unheard of.
During that year, the state had deprived us of raw milk with a bogus raw-milk bacterial scare. For more than one month, I suffered greatly, at least 3 times more without raw milk. That was when I realized how important raw milk was to me getting well. During the next 3 decades, I fought with millions of Californians to preserve raw milk on our store shelves and homes. In 1998, when Dr. Warner of California health department and his minion M.D.s on the Medical Milk Commissioners board,tried to thrust the final plunge into raw-milk freedom and kill it. The commissioners had effective made raw milk certification so difficult that raw milk only passed inspection 51% of the time. It bankrupt our only major raw dairy. I pledge to our raw milk freedom fighters to wage a campaign that would win.
I sought the counsel and help of Raymond Novell, the biological attorney who had successfully defended that raw-milk producer for decades. He told me that I was fighting a losing battle. He had fought the unscientific and irrational health departments for decades using his 500-pages biological and statistical arguments in favor of raw milk. He stated that we were at the new millennium of corporate control through government and raw milk would not survive. He said that the opposition had planned and forged their way federally, stately and locally so well that they would win and we would lose, including our rights to good health. I read his document. It was overwhelming. I could see that a non-biologist would not understand it and be afraid to make any decision based on it. They had to be as genius as Mr. Novell. They were not.
I realized that for our legislatures must understand our research and the innate safety of raw milk. I had to write in language they could understand. I recruited Dr. Douglass, MD to help me. I wrote the 49-pages Report In Favor of Raw Milk for Dr. Douglass with 80% of his research and 20% of mine. I wrote the 3-pages Executive Summary to that document which stated the legal ramifications if the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors deprived us of our milk. I got 2 ex-senators to hand deliver the documents to each supervisor.
Ninety-nine raw-milk drinkers showed for the rally for the Supervisors' votes to vote to keep raw milk controlled by the Commissioners or deem it safe enough to follow standard Grade A and Guaranteed raw milk regulations. The vote was 4-5 in favor of our right to raw milk without certification. That was a tremendous win for raw milk because it eliminated the Medical Milk Commission. There was no more need to certify raw milk because it was understood by our Supervisors with the Report In Favor Of Raw Milk that raw milk was innately safe.
No longer did the Commissioners who were mostly doctors determined to ban raw milk control our raw milk. After the vote, Raymond Novell shook my hand and would not let it go for several minutes, thanking me for my abilities and accomplishment saving raw milk in Los Angeles and California. I have continued to pool farmers and raw milk drinkers together under Right To Choose Healthy Food.
Fast forward to now. There is nothing more sinister than a food-club manager and a pseudo-farmer corrupting a food-club and its members with toxic commercially acquired product and selling it to its trusting and innocent members as better-than organically grown on a farm they claim was our food-club family farm. That is how James Stewart and Sharon Palmer sold members on buying the Healthy Family Farm, including seducing Larry Otting into financing the farm. Most of you already know the details of those two seriously conscience-deficient and malicious people. Basically, they infiltrated the healthy-food freedom movement with their greed and corruption and poisoned the members with toxic commercial food, everything we work so hard to avoid.
This week, the self-named "Health Ranger" Mike Adams has joined their ranks of corruption to destroy our healthy food movement with a vicious character-bashing campaign against me. He has attacked my HONORARY doctorate bestowed on me by the defunct Richmonds University. It seems that some sinister people are using the defunct university to forge diplomas for profit and fraud. He has compared mine with counterfeits. Because there are some counterfeits does not mean that all are counterfeits but that is his tactic. Rather than researching thoroughly, he has chosen to ignore proper research and reporting protocol and act as the sensational tabloids act without regard to truth and understanding.
Because of the way Mike Adams is systematically executing his character-bashing to invalidate my work and plight to rid of us food-freedom-abusing people like James Stewart and Sharon Palmer, he has crossed over to show his real nature. We now know that he must be an agent to harm our right to healthy food. If you listen to his commentaries, you will notice that he does not approach the entire issue of evidence that Palmer and Stewart bought commercial food and sold it to food-club members as organic and grown on the family farm. Is Mike Adams truly a government and/or corporate mole? With the vehemence of his rhetoric, he is doing nothing but defending criminals and bashing me. He argues my credentials and laboratory tests and if they are what is important rather than freedom.
I suggest that all of us who are truly involved in preserving and reclaiming our rights to healthy food not be sidetracked by such ravings. Look at the information logically.
Please read carefully the information at the following links:
Title: Re: Aajonus e-mail re rawesome-further update
Post by: CS on June 11, 2012, 06:10:23 am
Secret recording of Aajonus conversing with his lawyer, just posted on NaturalNews. Includes him apparently talking about extorting half a mil $ from Sharon Palmer. The plot thickens... :o
Secret recording of Aajonus conversing with his lawyer, just posted on NaturalNews. Includes him apparently talking about extorting half a mil $ from Sharon Palmer. The plot thickens... :o
Secret recording of Aajonus conversing with his lawyer, just posted on NaturalNews. Includes him apparently talking about extorting half a mil $ from Sharon Palmer. The plot thickens... :o
Wow! Thanks for that, CS. Very eye-opening. In light of this, Eric's critiques are looking understated and overly generous at this point. It gives the impression that Aajonus is even more money-grubbing than I anticipated. As Mike Adams indicated, this is very unfortunate for the raw community. GS, if you obtain a bigger context that somehow explains this, please do share it.
Title: Re: Aajonus e-mail re rawesome-further update
Post by: CS on June 11, 2012, 05:20:05 pm
I read that and it seems to be cut out of context. We need the bigger context to understand what that was about. And maybe Aajonus will answer that.
Well, it seems Aajonus was cornered by Mike Adams'fact-finding. He refused to address the glaring errors and negligence with regard to the lab tests he had performed. Bad pattern. I mean he completely sidesteps the issue of his questionable lab tests:
"He [Mike Adams] argues my credentials and laboratory tests and if they are what is important rather than freedom."
That's his single reference to the most important and potentially damaging aspect of this piece of journalism.
I think Aajonus is an incredibly gifted person with powers of intuition and shamanic abilities that coalesce with mine. He's helped me come really far with my health. Still, it seems here he's gotten stuck in the game... -d
Title: Re: Aajonus e-mail re rawesome-further update
Post by: goodsamaritan on June 11, 2012, 05:33:46 pm
Well, it seems Aajonus was cornered by Mike Adams'fact-finding. He refused to address the glaring errors and negligence with regard to the lab tests he had performed. Bad pattern. I mean he completely sidesteps the issue of his questionable lab tests:
"He [Mike Adams] argues my credentials and laboratory tests and if they are what is important rather than freedom."
That's his single reference to the most important and potentially damaging aspect of this piece of journalism.
I think Aajonus is an incredibly gifted person with powers of intuition and shamanic abilities that coalesce with mine. He's helped me come really far with my health. Still, it seems here he's gotten stuck in the game... -d
Correction.
Aajonus answered all of that here in these 3 blog posts:
Aajonus also says he established evidence in terms of receipts that the "Family Farm" was buying commercial produce... then reselling those produce as "organic". And he says this went on for months.
As far as the case from the government raiders... Aajonus claims that he is not listed as an informant.
So Aajonus' beef is regarding the selling of falsely labeled produce.
The government raiders seem to be about something else.
Title: Re: Aajonus e-mail re rawesome-further update
Post by: goodsamaritan on June 11, 2012, 05:43:44 pm
We should probably delve into the actual case number and details of the actual case.
All we have here is he said he said.
Title: Re: Aajonus e-mail re rawesome-further update
Post by: CitrusHigh on June 11, 2012, 08:12:43 pm
'extort'? Bullshit! IF i were Aaj, and I believed Sharon and James were defrauding people AND simultaneously fouling up the little RVAFood paradise (rawesome) I had put together, I'd skin them alive too!
If james and sharon are innocent, then obviously there is no case, no issue and Aaj would be the one who should either apologize, or if damage was done, repair it.
I just find way more congruence on the side of Aaj than these other two jokers. .
Title: Re: Aajonus e-mail re rawesome-further update
Post by: Projectile Vomit on June 12, 2012, 02:50:03 am
Although I'm happy to criticize Aajonus and his finagling, I have to agree with GS here and say I want more context before I draw any conclusions. This is a small snippet of what I assume is a longer conversation (and longer recording?). Of course, the snippet that is available doesn't cast AV in a very positive light, particularly given other recent findings...
Title: Re: Aajonus e-mail re rawesome-further update
Post by: monkeysee on June 13, 2012, 03:45:45 pm
'extort'? Bullshit! IF i were Aaj, and I believed Sharon and James were defrauding people AND simultaneously fouling up the little RVAFood paradise (rawesome) I had put together, I'd skin them alive too!