Paleo Diet: Raw Paleo Diet and Lifestyle Forum
Raw Paleo Diet Forums => Hot Topics => Topic started by: TylerDurden on May 07, 2014, 08:33:02 pm
-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/foodanddrinknews/10812696/Pizza-Express-reveals-halal-meat-used-in-all-chicken-dishes.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/foodanddrinknews/10812696/Pizza-Express-reveals-halal-meat-used-in-all-chicken-dishes.html)
-
Religious wars!
-
I don't understand. I'd be more up in arms about getting turkey "pork" products at Subway, as the article states.
Where does this end? Will hunters have to stun their prey before firing? Will fishermen have to stun fish before they bite the hook or enter the net?
And why does PETA get the last word in an article like this?
-
I don't understand. I'd be more up in arms about getting turkey "pork" products at Subway, as the article states.
Where does this end? Will hunters have to stun their prey before firing? Will fishermen have to stun fish before they bite the hook or enter the net?
And why does PETA get the last word in an article like this?
LOL I can just see it now hunters sallying forth with stun guns. Then they'll have to fill out forms in triplicate to send to the department of killing with kindness. KWK
-
I can see that I am being viewed as somewhat overly fanatical here, but I do have a point. I am not all that bothered with Muslims being sold halal meats from their own sources(ie each to their own), though I would generally prefer the animals being stunned beforehand rather than being consciously bled to death in order to satisfy some ghoulish ritual. What I object to is halal meat being sold to non-Muslims without their knowledge.I mean, these scumbag corporations know damn well that if they ever chose to label their meats as being of halal origin, then the vast majority of non-Muslims would no longer buy their crappy meats. Plus, allowing this sort of skullduggery merely allows other, more serious forms of wrongdoing to occur which really will impact our diets. That is why I am so against the governments banning raw dairy despite my being rather anti-raw-dairy-consumption myself.
-
I don't disagree with you Tyler. We should have the right to choose not based on someone else's religion.
-
I'm not against eating meats prepared by halal and kosher methods of slaughter. As a matter of fact, this was the method of chicken slaughter that I saw at my relatives' farm when I was young. In town, my family bought meats from a kosher butcher because my mother and grandmother said they tasted better. (Of course, pork chops, bacon, etc. came from another market.)
Nowadays, I buy lamb and goat from a halal ranch or halal markets. The ranch passed my "inspection." At the markets, nothing is hidden from view. My firsthand experience includes no ghoulish rituals, just well-raised livestock being prepared for market with a sharp knife.
I realize that California and UK have differences. This is one of them.
-
Hmm, I always remember the guru Tony Robbins pointing out that the lack of blood in kosher/halal meats results in them having a poorer taste. Although I will admit that kosher/halal meats can end up being sold heavily spiced.
-
i have read islam will be the majority in the uk in the next few decades.
-
i have read islam will be the majority in the uk in the next few decades.
It amazes me how religion is still such a big thing among many nonwhites. In the media, whenever one hears of a Christian who is suing some atheistic, draconian local authority in the UK re religious discrimination, one invariably finds that the plaintiffs are nearly always black. And then there is the current, mystifying increase of Catholics in China - why don't the latter just go in for Buddhism/Confucianism/Taoism or whatever - such more Chinese-oriented doctrines are anyway far healthier than the modern liberal-retard Roman Catholic Church.
I mean, most Whites have not bothered to go to Church or whatever for years even if they were raised in a religious household - it's a common saying now that "religion is only for ethnic minorities and queers". I always remember my Marxist-Liberation-Theology priest-nutters at my local Catholic congregation who more or less made it clear that they despised us local whites while they praised the poor benighted heathens they were converting over in Africa(ie poor people go to heaven, middle-class and up should go to hell). I utterly despise people who have this "Mrs Jellyby Complex".At any rate, Muslims weren't always this moronic as in the Middle-Ages they had a flourishing science and literature etc.(though mainly inspired by Rome and Ancient Greece, originally!). Ah well, maybe this explains the "Great Filter" - that is, we reached civilisation as a result of the survival of the fittest doctrine, whereas civilisation, unfortunately, seems to favour "survival of the least-fittest", thus eventually leading to extinction.
-
Well, the Daily Mail has another article on this same business of halal meat being covertly sold to non-Muslims without their being told it is of halal origin:-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2622830/Millions-eating-halal-food-without-knowing-How-big-brand-shops-restaurants-sell-ritually-slaughtered-meat-dont-label-it.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2622830/Millions-eating-halal-food-without-knowing-How-big-brand-shops-restaurants-sell-ritually-slaughtered-meat-dont-label-it.html)
What is really disturbing is that the article mentions how some UK schools have deliberately removed pork from the school-menus. That really is sick.
The Sikhs are worst off since their religion forbids them from eating any ritually-slaughtered animal.
-
It amazes me how religion is still such a big thing among many nonwhites...
Tyler, what is the fertility rate among the non-religious? Very very low. The abortion incidence among non-religious? Probably high?
What is the fertility rate among the religious? Higher than the non-religious.
You extrapolate a few decades and... ta dahhh... islam will rule Europe, I've seen that youtube video.
Muslims Are Taking Over The World at an ALARMING Rate - MUSLIM IMMIGRATION (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kKkY5EpVpY#)
and
Hundreds of thousand of Christians converting to Islam in Europe (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNGDBiC5Jk8#ws)
And a comment
Francozilla (May 07, 2014)
I don't mind Islam becoming the world's dominant religion. Islam is something the atheist, secular, and Marxist West will NEVER be able to pacify to Western code of living & ideology. Vast number of Muslims (women especially) are just loyal to "Allah" to the bone, that stupid things like "abortion" & "homosexuality" will NEVER be accepted among their ranks, no matter how much Western propaganda is thrown on their mugs. Muslims who immigrate to Europe & North America retain their ideological & cultural identity, while OUT BREEDING the idiotic, decadent, self destructing, and moronic WHITES of the mentioned regions. One thing I admire about Islam is the value of TRADITIONAL FAMILY (Man-Woman-Children), which the West has long abandoned, regardless of the founder being a pedophile.
Atheism will NEVER have a dominant world presence due their constant small population, and little to no desire to have children. Their "No God" propaganda being their only weapon to gain some numbers, not through breeding. Christianity will survive among the Latin Americans and Filipinos, because they also value traditional family values like the Muslims, while also forbidding abortion. Homosexuality among Filipinos & Latin Americans is at best TOLERATED, not promoted or accepted, even if Argentina legalized same-sex marriage. Bottom line... NUMBERS RULE.
The decadent Evangelical Christians, Jews, and Atheists of North America & Europe can AGE & ROT themselves to death. Would love nothing more than for them to be replaced by Muslims & Latin Americans. That's what they get for disgracing traditional family values. ?
-
The point is that the atheists are way more scientifically/culturally etc. -advanced than any religious people, regardless of ethnic affiliation. The Muslims are still stuck in a 7th Century AD-era impoverished cultural mindset, due to their religion, and are highly unlikely therefore to ever genuinely develop a highly technological society in the future - that means no human space-travel for them and therefore no escape when the next mass-species-killing event hits the Earth. The Earth will certainly be destroyed in c.300 million years, but mabe much, much sooner if we encounter a "Snowball Earth" event or an asteroid hitting the Earth etc., so Muslims will be wiped out at some stage by Mother Nature anyway.
So breeding en-masse is not necessarily always a survival trait. One does need brains and science as well.
What I am hoping is that before the very intelligent parts of the global hominid population all die out, that libertarian eugenics and genetic engineering become so far advanced that individiduals can routinely make such disciplines work for themselves. I mean, only a mental patient would prefer his children not to be blessed with better looks,better brain-power etc.
-
Tyler, maybe your non religious folk can mimic my style. I was always non religious, but very pro-life and pro-natal and scientific. (astro dork, engineer, programmer, linux admin, website developer, real healer, now studying birthing). The purpose of life is to make more life. And we must be a multi planetary species and keep on reproducing.
Women are sexy, making babies is good, taking care of and raising multiple babies wonderful and fulfilling, and raising grandchildren more so. That is my default program, just following it. Did your non religious in the UK lose that program?
-
The more humans turn away from Nature and refuse to be influenced by it, the worse off we will be. Take your limitless breeding notions. If the whole world had the same birth-rate as the Phillipines, soon the whole world would be flooded with humans. The results would be that our food-supply would quickly become more and more low in quality and scarcer, the environment would be ruined irreparably, and general quality of life would be miserable, with 12+ people sharing a room etc.
-
Here's Clegg on the halal meat issue:-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/nick-clegg/10815744/Nick-Clegg-I-would-eat-a-halal-pizza-but-it-must-be-labelled.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/nick-clegg/10815744/Nick-Clegg-I-would-eat-a-halal-pizza-but-it-must-be-labelled.html)
-
Polyface farms bleeds chickens to death. They put them in an inverted cone so their head sticks out then they slice their heads off and let them drain.
Not sure about other animals.
-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2623805/Our-shoppers-dont-care-meat-halal-claim-supermarkets-Retailers-face-backlash-saying-unnecessary-label-meats.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2623805/Our-shoppers-dont-care-meat-halal-claim-supermarkets-Retailers-face-backlash-saying-unnecessary-label-meats.html)
The supermarkets are clearly worried. They know damn well that if they are forced to label their meats as being kosher or halal, that no one will buy such meats and they will have to get the abbattoirs to start mostly producing non-halal/non-kosher meats.
-
More articles on this theme:-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2623860/Now-halal-sneaks-schools-Parents-angered-councils-ban-pork-sausages-bacon-replace-ritually-slaughtered-meat.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2623860/Now-halal-sneaks-schools-Parents-angered-councils-ban-pork-sausages-bacon-replace-ritually-slaughtered-meat.html)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2623879/We-Muslims-appalled-sale-halal-meat-stealth.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2623879/We-Muslims-appalled-sale-halal-meat-stealth.html)
-
So muslims are really increasing in consumer power in UK.
There seems to be no stopping the trend, your country is conquered.
There is no hope from secular brits to out reproduce islamic women.
You might want to look at the Turkish model, how to secularize Islam.
-
So muslims are really increasing in consumer power in UK.
There seems to be no stopping the trend, your country is conquered.
There is no hope from secular brits to out reproduce islamic women.
You might want to look at the Turkish model, how to secularize Islam.
The whole point is that, in this case, a few tiny minorities are being allowed to exert control over the eating-habits of a majority. This is truly a sick society. Hundreds of years ago, any Muslim immigrant in the UK forcing others to eat halal would have been summarily executed as being an anti-Christian heretic/pagan and that would be that.
-
The whole point is that, in this case, a few tiny minorities are being allowed to exert control over the eating-habits of a majority.
I had to look up how tiny a minority, and I was surprised. According to Wikipedia, 5% of England's population is Muslim (2011 Census). Even if that percentage is doubled by now, it makes me wonder how such a small minority has such clout. As a parallel, 5% - 10% of Americans are gluten intolerant, and no big effort is made to provide wheat-free restaurant fare.
How isolated are the reported incidents of halal-only meat offerings? Is this a big trend in England, or just a small anomaly? If it's a trend, how is such a small minority driving such a large commercial sector as food and restaurants? Are the Muslims taking over the food industry and then making decisions are business owners?
-
I had to look up how tiny a minority, and I was surprised. According to Wikipedia, 5% of England's population is Muslim (2011 Census). Even if that percentage is doubled by now, it makes me wonder how such a small minority has such clout. As a parallel, 5% - 10% of Americans are gluten intolerant, and no big effort is made to provide wheat-free restaurant fare.
How isolated are the reported incidents of halal-only meat offerings? Is this a big trend in England, or just a small anomaly? If it's a trend, how is such a small minority driving such a large commercial sector as food and restaurants? Are the Muslims taking over the food industry and then making decisions are business owners?
Basically, democracy used to be a tyranny of the majority, now it is a tyranny of the minorities. For example, the UK police openly admitted in recent years that they had deliberately avoided arresting various Muslim paedophile rings in the UK which had been openly sexually abusing/raping vulnerable white non-Muslim underaged girls from care-homes, purely because the police were afraid of being accused of racism. Previously, there had been a hopelessly biased " Macpherson Report" which had quite wrongly pretended that there was "institutional racism" in the UK police when, as newspapers admitted later, the real problem was actually endemic corruption.
The halal-/kosher-meat offerings in the UK are all-pervasive:-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2622830/Millions-eating-halal-food-without-knowing-How-big-brand-shops-restaurants-sell-ritually-slaughtered-meat-dont-label-it.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2622830/Millions-eating-halal-food-without-knowing-How-big-brand-shops-restaurants-sell-ritually-slaughtered-meat-dont-label-it.html)
Muslims do not necessarily control the abattoirs etc. It is just that the abattoirs are bone-idle and do not want separate facilities for halal/kosher meats and non-halal/non-kosher varieties. Hopefully, now there will be more pressure to force the supermarkets to label such meats.
-
One more update on the whole issue:-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/agriculture/food/10828907/Halal-meat-row-Ministers-will-consider-labelling-if-there-is-widespread-demand.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/agriculture/food/10828907/Halal-meat-row-Ministers-will-consider-labelling-if-there-is-widespread-demand.html)
Unfortunately, an MP's attempt to force the labelling of halal/kosher foods was roundly defeated, so much so, that this is just more proof of how hostile UK politicians are to the wishes and feelings of the general public.
The vet agency was of course talking utter b*ll*cks in that article. The issue of stunning before death is not the only one, there is also the point that the blood is let out of the animal during halal/kosher slaughter. The blood, apparently, contributes a lot ´to the taste, so bloodless meats are not desirable. Oh, I almost forgot:- the Jews, with their shechita slaughter, only apparently accept the front half of an animal and discard the other half to be given to the non-Jewish segment of the population.
-
Oh, I almost forgot:- the Jews, with their shechita slaughter, only apparently accept the front half of an animal and discard the other half to be given to the non-Jewish segment of the population.
Seriously! Geezus
-
Seriously! Geezus
Oh come on! That practice sounds like we are being given the dregs and leftovers.
-
Another article re this issue:-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2630421/Top-British-universities-including-Oxford-Manchester-secretly-serve-Halal-meat-unknowing-students.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2630421/Top-British-universities-including-Oxford-Manchester-secretly-serve-Halal-meat-unknowing-students.html)
-
What worries me is not so much the method of slaughtering which is a minor issue. What I fear is that they will continue to delete pork from menus until it becomes impossible to find a source thereof. I am no fan of pork as it is almost always grainfed, but I do eat raw wild boar a lot and do not want that affected.
-
Oh, I almost forgot:- the Jews, with their shechita slaughter, only apparently accept the front half of an animal and discard the other half to be given to the non-Jewish segment of the population.
This history of this hind-quarters giveaway practice is based on the difference between halal and kosher practices, which are quite identical regarding the slaughter of the animal, but differ in the meat-cutting department. Specifically, the kosher preparation of the animal's hind quarters requires the tedious removal of all the veins and various tendons before the meat can be eaten. To avoid all that work, the hind quarters are sold to the non-kosher market.
What I fear is that they will continue to delete pork from menus until it becomes impossible to find a source thereof.
I worry about the idea of one culture overriding another. The tug-of-war seems normal when cultures collide, but when one side wins, it's not a game anymore.