I’ve seen some incredible improvements that people have achieved with the right supplementation at the right time. I think the most important item you touch on is regenerative food production. So much nowadays is depletionary practices and that mineral depletion in our foods is driving so many modern illnesses. In particular is the sequestering of manganese by glyphosate. The ramifications of this on downstream processes is so critical it upends the whole organism. Vitamin B2 in particular MUST be in place for proper utilization of the other Bs and is completely dependent on manganese. The one two of B2 deficiency to B1 deficiency cripples the whole organism.

Exactly. I don't know if it's gonna change. The only path I see is to let people suffer and to understand it themselves or seek truth. Not only those. Iron, Magnesium, Potassium, Zinc, Copper etc. are lacking or depleted.

It's not about being religious or dogmatic. It is about scientific discovery and learning what the human genome and epigenome, and hence maximum genetic expression would look like which literally can only be observed under total biochemical fidelity. See Pottenger's cats. Most humans are between Pottenger's 2nd and 4th generation of degradation. And for most it would take 4-8 generations of no synthetics, all raw k2-rich animal foods, and almost nil carbs to get back to flawless. Possibly more.

Obviously people can do whatever they want. It is just common and unexceptional, uninspiring, and unilluminating. We have plenty of data for what garbage genetics look like, we have *zero* data for maximum expression aka the ideal. In other words, it would be a bigger accomplishment than going to space or visiting the deepest part of the oceans which the Chinese, at least, have already done. Savvy?

Furthermore, due to the Pottenger phenomenon, none of us can even reach the ideal in our lifetime. All we can do is lay a foundation. Most important would be producing flawless sperm and ova, to the extent our current epi/genome will allow and then raising those offspring in purity.

Also please don't bring up the supposed flaw of Pottenger's studies. That "flaw" itself actually gets filed under evidence *for* the deleterious effects of cooking and cats do *not* do just "fine" when the relevant molecules are manually reintroduced to cooked foods or vets would not be making money hand over fist on feline pathogenesis. No, we are not cats, but we get similar problems due to cooking from other nutrients ruined by cooking, such as iodine and k2.

We don't the condition of the foods in pottengers experiments or how he cooked them. It is very hard to cook meat properly keep both benefits of raw and cooked.

This is a "Raw" forum.
If you do a search,you could find tons of info on this.
But if you're happy cooking/heating your food,that's fine.There are plenty of forums such as Keto,Zero Carb,Paleo...etc where you could find others that share similar views.

I have eaten quite a lot of raw animal foods and still do. But I find some are easier to digest for me cooked due to my health problems. I have read that info and it is mostly related to overcooking and some unconfirmed statements. You can cook while preserving the raw the benefits but getting the benefits of cooking. People do as they please anyway I am just sharing my pov. I was opposed to cooking much more and I still eat raw.

Explain how cooking meat should be bad for sickly people who don't even produce enough juices to breakdown the meat? In my opinion overcooking is one reason people opt for completely raw. You barely produce any negative substances when lightly cooking especially if you don't use fats or water to cook. Foods do get oxidized anyway in the stomach afaik do they not? I agree on one thing though don't damage food through cooking or eat it raw. Do what makes you feel vital usually everything else is dogma. Especially fats shouldn't be cooked or cooked with.

As regards baldness, there are so many variables. I mean, Europeans are more likely to experience baldness, yet they are not necessarily less healthy than asians, say. Native Americans, being Asians, do have a genetic advantage re warding off baldness, but this has nothing to do with health.

One other consideration:- it is generally viewed by anthropologists that  neoteny(having childlike features when adult) is a sign of increasing evolution. Since neoteny involves less body hair(body hair is a sign of maturity/adulthood) one could even argue that baldness is an evolutionary advantage re increased neoteny.

I disagree. My point of view is that based on your health/nutrition status different bodies/genetics prioritize different body parts to maintain/nourish. I mostly agree with Weston Prices  research because of my own observations too for example I think he was right about gracilization and lengthening of the body. I had that point of view before reading the book.

We can agree to disagree. Conventional farmed meat, even "nutrient dense" sources, gave me acidosis. Nutrient dense grassfed meat changed my health. The fat is also as much, if not more, important than the muscle meat. Organs too which I wouldn't touch from a conventional source.

Of course the more natural the better. But I do think you can do fine on conventional red meat. Do you mean you got acidosis from conventional red-meat? But not from grass-fed red meat? How did you establish that you got acidosis? Of course it's better especially when it comes to organs. But conventional red meat at least here in Austria should be more nutrient dense and healthier than for example pastured chicken.

Don't sound like nourishing foods. Why would you eat these? I mean of the vegetables, roots like potatoes are more nutrient-dense but still. And why eat the meat raw, do you notice any difference? And how did you prepare the meat when cooking it?

What I understood from my research I will tell you. The reason you don't gain healthy weight is because your whole organism is unhealthy, although you probably can gain unhealthy weight if you eat junk or anything. You probably have also unhealthy body tissues and fluids accumulated first you will lose weight if you are on the right path. For some it's unhealthy eating but also our foods are getting less nutrient dense thanks to modern civilization and the environment more toxic. Fruits, Sugars even Milk can be harmful if eaten too much, especially fruit sugar in any form honey etc. AV wasn't right on everything. Those wild people that eat honey are simply more vital and robust than us, your starting point is disease. In that state fruits, honey etc. don't nourish a weak organism. There can only be afaik about 5 grams of sugar in your blood, that can be carried around. You don't need carbohydrates to gain weight it's a myth, at best unhealthy diseased weight. Also for sick people it is ok to cook your meat lightly as your stomach doesn't produce the right amount of digestive juices to break it down. Almost forgot one very important point, you are what you absorb not what you eat. You are welcome, some high quality insider information. Don't steal it like Frank Tufano or Paul Saladino haha

Hello, I live in Austria. Welcome to the forum. I would be open to have a chat. Open-minded people are so rare nowadays. I hoped to get to know some, in this scene.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2oJk8d_nCA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKbkIU7ghqE

And still struggle with candida :'D

Hey guys. Have you done this and would like to share your experiences? Especially raw conventional poultry.

Well I guess some vegans got pissed