Fundamentally, this is a logic problem. You see, it's not what the Eskimos' were eating, it is what they were NOT eating. Many observers note lower cancer rates in them due to the high healthy fat content, but because they lacked fiber and plant materials, they must be considered one of the most extreme human conditions. To attach them to a modern diet, one would have to say they are old school Atkins. He believed we were carnivores, purely. As in all things, moderation. Faces give nothing away about aging. Cells do, however. General observations about a population are not scientific. If that were the case, Alabama would be considered the worst population sample ever and they live in a place with abundant supplies of everything. Don't let eskimos' issues take you off the path.