Journals / Re: Lex's Journal
« on: December 26, 2009, 03:33:26 am »Dr. William Davis at The Heart Scan Blog talks extensively about the dangers of too many small dense LDL particles in the blood...a predictor of heart disease.
http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/to-track-small-ldl-track-blood-sugar.html in this post Dr Davis talks about
using measurements of BG as being a rough way to determine the particle count of small dense LDL in the blood. Higher BG correlates to higher levels of small dense LDL particles which is a marker for a cardiac event.....a direct at home inexpensive method to evaluate one's diet and can assist in determining the affect of any specific food on BG and therefore small dense LDL particles.
Whereas, A1c levels usually are much more expensive and may not provide any more information than BG testing. And direct testing of LDL particle size by NMR, VAP is also expensive.
Does A1c provide us any useful information other than satisfy curiosity of each of our readings....that the reading falls within the acceptable
reference ranges of the mainstream medical establishment?
And with your average BG readings hovering around 100 all the time because you don't consume any carbs, why worry about A1c? And by extention your
small dense LDL should be less than 10% of total LDL. The remainder are all large, fluffy non irritating particles.