Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bleeding

Pages: [1]
1
Journals / Re: Lex's Journal
« on: April 24, 2010, 09:03:25 am »
Another forum I'm on had this discussion - it was claimed that if you use firefox there are addons that will let you download the mp3 that's "behind" a flash application.

net video hunter and flashgot were mentioned 

    Will there be MP3s available of it?  Wow.  :)


2
Journals / Re: Lex's Journal
« on: April 24, 2010, 09:00:37 am »
I don't know why but I expected you would speak with a faster tempo but you have a very pleasant, calmingly paced voice, Rex.   

    We talked for well over an hour and she has spent a good bit of time trying to edit the result down to something worth listening too.  You can find the results here:

http://joanneunleashed.com/2010/04/lex-rooker-talks-about-his-rawall-meat-diet-and-relief-from-migraines/

Lex


3
Journals / Re: Lex's Journal
« on: February 24, 2010, 06:15:14 am »
  see what they want to see, not what is written.  I tend to do this myself.  I suppose it is human nature


It's far worse, more generalized and pervasive than just reading

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

4
Journals / Re: Lex's Journal
« on: February 24, 2010, 06:00:41 am »
Now this is very interesting.

Does anyone here have a chemistry background & can tell us if fatty acid oxidation produces any citrate, as compared with carbohydrate oxidation?

from my failing memory of biochem classes, almost all the cycles that end in ATP appear to use citrate, but is more citrate made by the body, if it's on one diet or another?

  Dexter sent me an emial with an article stating that children on a ketogenic diet for epilepsy were having great success by adding potassium citrate to every meal.  This seems to keep the stones from forming.  What the mechanism is I have no idea as the article didn't say.

Lex

5
Journals / Re: Lex's Journal
« on: January 10, 2010, 12:45:04 pm »
The stone is more like an open crystal structure with sharp points and small needle like projections.  It scrapes its way through ureters and urethera shredding tissue along the way.  The only way I can describe the pain is to think of very slowly ripping your stomach open with the point of an ice pick while continuosly pouring alcohol on the wound.  The pain is relentless and can continue at an intense level for hours at a time.

Lex
boy oh boy.  Thanks for the technical info, and my pupils shrunk to near zero, and most of my scrotum and penis retracted completely into my abdomen in sympathetic pain

6
Journals / Re: Lex's Journal
« on: January 06, 2010, 12:06:05 pm »
I donate blood, and every time I take the swab off to watch the blood flowing out ... just my morbid curiosity.

So I have no problem with bleeding, but ...  I cannot imagine red urine.  Makes me shudder.  I would NOT have waited "because there was no pain".   You're a tough nut, Lex.

"stone" conjures up something with smooth surfaces.  Is this a bad assumption on my part?   do these actually have sharp edges  and needles?

"stone" would never make me think of  of bleeding ... not like the way they describe gout,  "crystal in your joint"

Just two stones. They said nothing about additional calcification of the kidneys.

Apparently there is an ultrasonic intervention that can be taken if the stones are of sufficient size.  Mine are in the 3mm range (1/8") and are far to small for ultrasonic to have any effect.  There is an option where they can insert an catheter and manually crush the stones in the bladder, but they only do this as a last resort as the procedure is expensive and rather invasive.

Lex

7
Journals / Re: Lex's Journal
« on: January 06, 2010, 04:18:26 am »
I would think zero carb is better.   Like Moshe Feldenkrais used to say (in a completely different context) - it gets better when you use your whole body.    Just as a general principle, spreading the "damage" out over the whole body instead of limiting it to the liver.    We don't see the glycation effects on the liver because the standard tests don't measure that.  

I thought your guess that you're eating some of this material (HBA1c) was right on the money.  

The whole thing reminds me of a hyperlipid post a little while ago where Peter wrote that when you eat a high fat meal you absorb your dead gut bacteria's gram negative proteins.  If you eat a high carb meal you absorb none of the gram negative dead residue.  

Well, the residue is "bad" for you - not as bad as if you had a gram negative bacterial infection, but still bad.

Turns out your immune system uses the digested gram negative material to gauge what's happening in your gut.  On high carb the immune system is denied this information.  


bleeding,
Interesting ideas about HbA1c.  Not sure what the practical implications are howerver.  If HbA1c is a true indication of total glycation products, and we want to keep these products low, then maybe the effects of eating ZC is counter productive.  It seems to be sort of a catch-22.  If we eat a normal high carb diet then over time we get pathological insulin resistance and HbA1c rises.  If we eat ZC then we get physiolgical insulin resistance and HbA1c rises.  Wonder if this supports the idea that LC or VLC is the better approach?

Thoughts?

Lex

I bet in the end it's just like ketosis - if you're diabetic it's something to watch closely.  If you're not diabetic it's interesting information, but nothing to fuss over.  

One reason high-carb eaters are insulin resistant is the constant high levels of insulin make the muscles reduce the number of insulin receptors.  The opposite is likely true for you.

I believe if you ate carbs again you would have about a week of hardship because some of your digestive and other carbohydrate-handling enzymes have down-regulated.   After a week your insulin resistance would disappear quickly (doesn't take long for the palmitic acid and ketones to get flushed out of the blood)   and you would be extremely insulin sensitive.   Your pancreas has probably had a great vacation too, having to put out a small fraction of the "normal" output.  

The low-fat dieter is insulin resistant for a long time to come.  

8
Journals / Re: Lex's Journal
« on: January 04, 2010, 12:04:16 am »
Hey Lex - here's a theory about your HBA1c

When a regular diet-eater eats, their liver gets the bulk of the insulin spike and processes the bulk of the incoming glucose.     Most of their body is not exposed to a high glucose level OR to as high an insulin level as the liver is.

BUT the rest of the body does get the insulin later, after the liver's mopped up most of (or a large fraction of) the glucose.

Your muscles, from the palmitic acid & ketones, are highly insulin resistant (a good thing in your case - the muscle doesn't WANT to be insulin sensitive).  The "normal-dieter" 's muscles are  nowhere near as insulin resistant as yours, so glucose that does make it into their blood is reduced quickly by the insulin's effects on muscle and adipose tissue.  

Most of their body "sees"  on average less glucose than yours does - it's their liver that's getting kicked in their shorts.  

In your body the liver's being spared the huge glucose, fructose and insulin spikes, BUT more proteins are being exposed to a higher average level of glucose for longer periods than the "normal" - diet eater.

If you have any science geek friends they could probably run a simulation that will show this; your whole-body "area under the curve" is a little bit higher.

For the average person, "area under curve" for the liver is disproportionately high, but whole-body "area under the curve" is lower.  

Pages: [1]
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk