I was laying down thinking - if you're eating carnivorously and have dietary needs such as vitamin a, k, calcium, etc - then why not consume the animals that eat what satisfies those dietary needs?
Think about it this way.
On a carnivorous diet we eat only animals not plant life - but we still have plant based vitamin needs. Which are satisfied through animals! But which animals satisfy those hmm?
Bison, Rabbits, Cows, Elk, etc Wild Game, Lamb, all grass/plant life eating animals aka herbivores.
I just found out that it's been noted that grass fed animals raw have high amounts of vitamin e, folate, vitamin c, and a all found in grass. So basically we're deriving our needs from them because they're eating what we need! However, due to our digestive system grass doesn't really seem to agree with us hmm?
Now think about it this way - what other animals are there:
Sealife , etc:
Shellfish, fish and insects, pigs:
Now they may eat plantlife ie algae, seaweed, etc - but they also come into contact with parasitic eggs, dirt (parasites), and some eat other animals too. I know whale, and some fish have vitamin a, c, and folate - but, think about it this way.
If we just focused on cattle and land animals - then would that cut our risk of parasitic infections? It seems harder to get parasites from a grass fed cow eating only grass and not animal products or animals or in contact with feces than say a pig who digs into a ground, or a fish who swallows a bunch of parasites/parasitic eggs in the sea.
I'm not discounting anyone eating these other animals however because mostly parasitic infection is rare even to paleoers. But it seems like an interesting idea to focus on animals that satisfy our needs are aren't "dirty" because they come into contact with dirt, or other carnivorous animals, etc.
Anyone get my idea?
