The Biggest Company You've Never Heard of

[raw-al]

http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/corporatism/the-biggest-company-youve-never-heard-of.html

Conspiracy theorists have at it !

Is this the sign of end times/sign of 666/New World Order/final countdown? 

I mean I'm only kind of laughing......

[cherimoya_kid]

Their CEO listens to God....that's not what I want to hear from the company that maintains the UK's nuclear missiles.

[ys]

I don't understand your paranoia.  This company is somewhat small being just over 2b cap.  There are thousands of companies of similar size that you never heard of.  There are hundreds of much bigger companies over 10b cap that not many people heard of.

CEO listens to GOD.  What a nonsense.  CEO only listens to the board of directors.  If he doesn't the board will replace him in an instant.  If you want you can buy enough SRP shares and vote in your directors so you can sleep better at night.

They probably forgot to mention that the CEO and the board are under Zionist influence.  Now the conspiracy is complete.

What else you got?

[svrn]

The part to be paranoid about is the fact that they are handling so many things that the government should be handling yet they are private.

We all know that the merger of state and corporate power=fascism.

[RawZi]

    It figures school and prison is run by the same people.  I like school, don't get me wrong, just like truly harmonious things rather than the idea of these institutions. Not sure if I like prisons either, don't sound like the best places for corrections. What would the paleo solution be to prisons?  I read one of them stopped serving soy and is only using grassfed meats.

[Dorothy]

The part to be paranoid about is the fact that they are handling so many things that the government should be handling yet they are private.

We all know that the merger of state and corporate power=fascism.

Troll - since the FED is privately owned - it doesn't matter much what else the government is not controlling.

[svrn]

The Fed is just on top of it all, everything else still matters though. I think that the comapny in this videois talking about england though.

Which prison started using grassfed meats instead of soy? I'd be pretty interested to hear about that since in my opinion the worst part of prison is the food they make you eat.

[Dorothy]

England has a fed. Country by country the feds of other countries get them  started. It doesn't matter much what they call them in other countries as they are all the same thing.
 
Does it really matter though whether a private company or the government controls such things? Do you think the government would do a better job?

Do you have personal experience of the food or is that second-hand opinion?
 

[ys]

The part to be paranoid about is the fact that they are handling so many things that the government should be handling yet they are private.

Are you kidding me??  Government can't handle even the simplest things such as mail delivery.  Look at Fedex and UPS, making billions in profits and US post office is losing billions.

[svrn]

It seems as though some of you dont understand the advantages a government has in handing over certain responsibilities to private corporations. It allows them to say they are public when it suits their needs in a certain situation or they say they are private when it suits them in that other situation.

Are you kidding me??  Government can't handle even the simplest things such as mail delivery.  Look at Fedex and UPS, making billions in profits and US post office is losing billions.

I agree that the private sector always does things better than the government. You are missing my point however. Im not saying that the government should do everything, quite the opposite. Im just saying when they start handing over things such as military operations (blackwater and such), prisons, or the right to print currency; you are creating a situation where things are not truly private but in a quasi public/private sort of limbo that only serves to confuse the little people as well as breed massive corruption. It makes so that 1) the government is unnacountable and 2) so whatever "private" company the people want to audit or something can simply say no as the fed has on several occasions.

Im saying that public and private need to be kept completely seperate. Not that government should do everything. Id prefer that it did nothing.

[Dorothy]

It seems as though some of you dont understand the advantages a government has in handing over certain responsibilities to private corporations. It allows them to say they are public when it suits their needs in a certain situation or they say they are private when it suits them in that other situation.

I agree that the private sector always does things better than the government. You are missing my point however. Im not saying that the government should do everything, quite the opposite. Im just saying when they start handing over things such as military operations (blackwater and such), prisons, or the right to print currency; you are creating a situation where things are not truly private but in a quasi public/private sort of limbo that only serves to confuse the little people as well as breed massive corruption. It makes so that 1) the government is unnacountable and 2) so whatever "private" company the people want to audit or something can simply say no as the fed has on several occasions.

Im saying that public and private need to be kept completely seperate. Not that government should do everything. Id prefer that it did nothing.

You are right. I did not understand your most excellent point. Thanks for clarifying it.

[ys]

I don't see any issues whatsoever to outsource such functions to publicly traded reputable companies.  They'll do the job much better than any government and cheaper.  Publicly traded companies such as SRP mentioned in the video get audited every year because they have to adhere to very strict guidelines to be listed.

Another point is if they screw up they will get accountable and persecuted.  Try that with government.

The more critical a function the stricter the selection would be.  When Arabs tried to purchase seaport operations Congress blocked it.  If it was a domestic company it would be no issue.

Any kind of sabotage on the massive scale happens only in the movies and in the minds of conspiracy theorists.

And lastly, you guys are watching too many movies about evil Umbrella corporations.
 

[cherimoya_kid]

I don't see any issues whatsoever to outsource such functions to publicly traded reputable companies.  They'll do the job much better than any government and cheaper.  Publicly traded companies such as SRP mentioned in the video get audited every year because they have to adhere to very strict guidelines to be listed.

Strict guidelines like military contractors not being able to murder Iraqi civilians?

I'm 100% against the Iraq war, but military contractors there have literally gotten away with murder.  IF your excuse is that the Iraqis aren't people, ok, fine, but there's no way you can say that the oversight/accountability of those contractors is equal to the military's oversight of enlisted personnel.

Which all goes back to my point about Britain's nuclear arsenal.  Too many movies, eh?  I think you've been watching too much Rush Limbaugh.

[TylerDurden]

Here's an article demonstrating that one cannot rely either  on Serco or on doctors:-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/laura-donnelly/8963014/Telephone-blunders-behind-out-of-hours-deaths.html