Once again, some very biased anti-rawists are trying to undermine the Raw Foodism Wikipedia page. If anyone can come up with convincing rebuttals to some of the biased comments from the anti-raw camp, then I would be most grateful. The wikipedia page is here(register/sign-in to wikipedia beforehand, if possible, though it's not necessary - make sure to justify any additions/deletions, and make comments on the talk-page about what you've done/why you've done it etc.):-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raw_foodismThe talk/discussion page is here:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Raw_foodism(if anyone can , in the "early 20th century" section of the raw foodism page, add in 2-3 paragraphs specifically mentioning Dr Howell's and Dr Weston-Price's research into raw foods and their conclusions, that would be great). Feel free to replace the current muddled sentence).
