65 Million Yrs Ago My A** - time to revise the time scales

[goodsamaritan]

Check it out guys,

It is high time the time scales were revised!
65 million years ago is BS.
Mummified with everything intact for 65 million years is BS.
Quantavolution to the rescue.

National Geographic features a mummified dinosaur.
Yep.  With skin and muscles.
They will probably reach the skull and the stomach later on with their analysis.
Watch this analysis unfold.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071203-dino-mummy.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP8Rx6s5iho

[goodsamaritan]

Updated 6 part video on youtube of further analysis of the dino mummy

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Dinosaurs+may+Be+Only+thousands+of+years+old&aq=f

tons of links to more articles here:

http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=123

[Sitting Coyote]

Calm yourself, GS.  The National Geographic video says plainly that it's a fossil like all others, just with fossilized skin and organs too.  This just means it was much less disturbed during the fossilization process than other fossils.

[goodsamaritan]

Calm yourself, GS.  The National Geographic video says plainly that it's a fossil like all others, just with fossilized skin and organs too.  This just means it was much less disturbed during the fossilization process than other fossils.

Nat Geo is not the only opinion out there.
Nat Geo assumes too much.

tons of links to more articles here:

http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=123

And insights of other people regarding this issue.

The nat geo locomotion computations always compute for gravity = same as today, but there is also the possibility that gravity in the "old" days was a lot less.  There is the hypothesis that the gravity exhibited by a planet is dependent on its electrical charge.

Quantavolution gives a perfectly scientifically acceptable explanation of why evolution just make fantastic jumps in record time.  And why "slow evolution" needs a make over.  Even the "slow evolution" scientists accept possible catastrophic events such as asteroid strikes.  Which falls into the realm of Quantavolution.

[goodsamaritan]

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/070412-dino-tissues.html

Dinosaur Soft Tissue Sequenced; Similar to Chicken Proteins
Scott Norris
for National Geographic News
April 12, 2007

Ancient collagen—the main protein component of bone—has been extracted from the remains of a 68-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex, according to two new reports.

The new studies provide strong support for the hotly debated claims that organic material previously extracted from the T. rex's leg bone is original dinosaur soft tissue that somehow escaped fossilization.

Now, for the first time, scientists have obtained partial protein sequences from the soft tissue remains.

"The sequences are clearly from T. rex," said John Asara of Harvard Medical School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who led one of the studies.

In addition, both studies found similarities between the dino sample and the bone collagen of chickens, providing molecular support for the hypothesis that modern birds are descended from dinosaurs.

---------

Awesome discovery.

Which still people have to scoff at this 68 million year old fossil with collagen intact.
Maybe it's not 68 million years ago.
Maybe it's merely hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Maybe it's merely tens of thousands of years ago.
It's time to shake up the time scales.

[TylerDurden]

All these Velikovskian theories have already been widely debunked by scientists. Well, except for one minor one, but that was only through luck on the part of Velikovsky, not via serious scientific analysis. Catastrophism sounds like a very nice theory but it just doesn't work in practice.

[goodsamaritan]

Come on Tyler.
Velikovski was the mere inspiration.

It is www.thunderbolts.info that the status quo has to debunk.
www.thunderbolts.info = velikovski on raw paleo diet
So far www.thunderbolts.info is winning the hearts and minds of people with evidence and predictions due to the electrical nature of the universe and planetary science.

There is nothing threatening about Quantavolution or Fast Forward Evolution during periods of fast changes.  It is still evolution.  Only better.  And faster.  And more logical.  And as you can see now, the new mummified dinosaurs are exposing the fraud of 65 million years ago.

So how bad is it for you or me if the status quo admits they were wrong about 65 million years and it was just 650,000 years?  or it was 65,000 years?

It is incredulous with the nat geo video does not even question the 65 million year old assumption.  Which is laughable.  Now that yes, skin, cartilage, proteins are being recovered and more are discovered.

Can't stop progress.

Evidence, evidence, evidence trumps old guesses.

Listen to that dino expert about what this mummified dino find says... they were wrong... about a great many things.

This is exciting science!

Let's do better science.  That old dog science has got to go or the superstitious book thumping nuts will look better... horrors!

[TylerDurden]

Quantavolution is merely a continuance of Velikovsky's absurd notions. It doersn't add anything new of any value.

[majormark]

In addition, both studies found similarities between the dino sample and the bone collagen of chickens, providing molecular support for the hypothesis that modern birds are descended from dinosaurs.

You mean dinos would taste like chicken?

[goodsamaritan]

Quantavolution is merely a continuance of Velikovsky's absurd notions. It doersn't add anything new of any value.

Oh yeah, but when "mainstream" scientists promote asteroids killed the dinos you think that's okay? That's not pushing evolution fast forward?

You may not like the term quantavolution.  So people will invent other words for it. Call it "Evolution x10" = faster and better in jumps.

65 million years ago for these dinosaurs sound more ridiculous as the years of unprecedented evidence excavation of many more dino mummies are found. 

Time to question the "establishment."  The assumption that these mummies were preserved for 65 million years.

[TylerDurden]

Actually, the extinction event which happened 65 million years ago has been ascribed to other possibilities such as volcanic eruptions at the Deccan flats or a supernova. It's only the Velikovskian notions which have been extensively debunked.

[goodsamaritan]

Check out this quote guys:

http://discovermagazine.com/2006/apr/dinosaur-dna/article_view?b_start:int=1&-C=

Schweitzer's Dangerous Discovery

When this shy paleontologist found soft, fresh-looking tissue inside a T.rex femur, she erased a line between past and present. Then all hell broke loose

by Barry Yeoman, Photography by Cedric Angeles
From the April 2006 issue; published online April 27, 2006

Schweitzer scoffs at visions of dinosaur parks. If anyone ever finds dinosaur DNA, she says, it will be fragmented and incomplete. In the unlikely event that scientists could reconstruct a complete dinosaur genome, she doubts that any modern animal could produce an egg capable of growing a dinosaur embryo. And even if that hurdle could be crossed, a viable dinosaur might not last long in 2006: "As far as we know, the way the lung tissue functioned, the way the hemoglobin functioned, was designed for an atmosphere that's very different than today's."


-----

So dino scientists already know that the atmosphere during dino times was different!

Think about it.

Maybe we humans just encountered a recent disaster that wiped out lots of civilizations or somehow we just recently became human... why humans can't agree on what is our real food.

Think about it.  If humans became humans hundreds of thousands of years ago, did they just sit around and progress to nothing?  While we made so much progress in 10,000 years?

back to: Dino scientists already know that the atmosphere during dino times was different!

How about BUYTENKO?  That guy who has breathing exercises for asthmatics?  His analysis of the human lung is that it compensates for a time when the earth's atmosphere had higher amounts of carbon dioxide.


Shoot down those stable earth guesses.