OK,I've made some strenuous efforts to change the raw foodism wikipedia page to one which at least isn't so rabidly anti-raw as before. Trouble is that now two people are trying to force me to remove the section devoted to studies on the toxins in cooked foods, while the 3rd, while more reasonable, is only interested in keeping 1 big paragraph of the studies. If anyone wants to help out, please go to the raw foodism wikipedia talk page, and give reasons(at the very bottom of the raw foodism talk page) as to why it should be kept. Make sure to keep objectivity and speak from a neutral point of view, they won't accept an argument stating that "rawists insist that the studies on toxins in cooked foods must be kept", they need extra arguments. You could also simply write that you agree with me! Here's the Raw Foodism Talk page:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Raw_foodism
