Rawesome, Raw Milk and Truth
Written by admin on April 27th, 2012. Posted in Public Articles, Raw Milk, Importance Of, Testimonials
A Response to an Article in the New Yorker Magazine
Prejudice against Raw Milk
Louis Pasteur – more complete information
I agree, David, [Gumpert - see
www.TheCompletePatient.com] that the New Yorker article was a little more favorable to our right to have the foods we want, including raw milk. However, I do not understand why the author reiterates the fraudulent disease-“statistics” from CDC, health department, university and processed-food employees and investors as if the statistics were based on science and fact, especially since they possess such a superstitious prejudice against raw milk.
The Pasteur info was stated as if it were case history. The Sorbonne’s Pasteur Institute of the time was hot on the heals of Pasteur’s heat-process that stopped the molding of his friends wine grapes, thereby saving his friend’s land that he would have lost if his grapes were not made into wine and sold. The Sorbonne jumped on Pasteur’s coats tails at the time to ride the notoriety as if they had helped Pasteur with his idea. They captured the lips and ears of Europe with the publicity that pasteurization arrested the mold in the picked grapes. The medical community jumped on the band wagon stating that Pasteur’s process proved that germs caused disease such as the molds.
However, it was not widely publicized that the wine was abominable to the connoisseur, not sold at posh markets and restaurants but sold to the impoverished who normally could not afford wine. The pasteurized wine was of tainted quality mainly because of pasteurization. It was sold cheap, but it sold.
The affluent class that experienced failed wine crops in the past, now had a market for a processed cheap and inferior food. They would never suffer a complete loss again. The market was the trusting poor public that thought they were getting a drink from the rich man’s quality table. It was sold and marketed as such. There were many reports of illness from consumption of the pasteurized wine, including irrational behavior, increased accidents and violence. Pasteurization alters enzymes, minerals and trace fats that restrict the quick absorption of radical sugars and alcohol.
Cases of ‘no science’ being reported as science
While being interviewed for almost 2 hours for this article, I explained how the CDC and health departments base their statistics about raw-milk borne disease on surveys not science. That should have been obvious when it could have been verified that Organic Pasture’s milk did not cause those children’s illnesses because there was none of that bacteria in the milk. Bacteria in a calf that does not produce milk, and the fact that that bacteria is not airborne, should be enough facts to demonstrate that the illnesses were not caused by the raw milk they consumed but something else.
Also, the girls who were obviously sick and hospitalized in San Diego – whose sickness was caused by something other than raw milk – received massive amounts of antibiotics such as Ciprofloxacin that caused kidney disorders exactly like those of HUS in laboratory animals. Therefore, it was likely the antibiotics in such massive concentrations that caused the kidney damage, not the bacteria for which they were being treated and wrongly blamed on raw milk. The author has misled every reader to believe that raw milk caused the illnesses.
Stating that pasteurization makes milk safe was a blatant falsehood. In the history of pasteurized milk, there have been over 500,000 cases of scientifically-proved incidences of food-poisoning, literally epidemics, one involving 197,000 people. Raw milk is condemned by accusations – not science, surveys and statistics. When a doctor or hospital reports bloody vomit or diarrhea, a health-department clerk calls the person who suffered and asks – after the fact – what they ate 2-12 weeks. Who remembers all that they ate yesterday much less weeks after an intense illness? If the person states that they drank raw milk, raw milk is automatically determined to be the cause. That is not science but prejudicial survey and false statistics.
I have seen literally thousands of very sick individuals recover from disease by drinking raw dairy and eating raw meats. I do not know how “investigative” journalists sleep at night with such poor research. Seems nothing is very thoroughly investigated and the status-quo concepts continue to be regurgitated and accepted as unquestionable truth. A proper investigation would have entailed a study of the children and elderly who have completely recovered from their illness while drinking raw milk. A good comparative study would have entailed children and elderly who stayed trapped in their diseases while not drinking raw milk but taking medical drugs that offer no cure or proper healing.
Benefits of raw milk ignored
Take for example Walker Kerhrer who was an asthmatic boy. At 8 years old in 2001, he testified before the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors that before he drank raw milk he suffered terrible asthma and that when he did not have his raw milk, he suffered terrible asthma. In 2009, Walker was the top high school tennis champion in the USA. Will that fact be filed away in the minds of the medical- and university-indoctrinated minds as anecdotal information?
Notice that the author of the New Yorker article stated that my recovery from blood, bone, lymphatic and stomach cancers were merely my personal claims. She could have easily researched the truth by seeking the hospital records at the hospitals where I was treated. She didn’t ask for proof. I could have shown her and given her her photos of my surgical scars to verify but she did not ask. I have a letter written by one of my doctors at the time that berated me for discontinuing chemo-treatments with a 1% chance of recovery. Such doctors are insane. From medical treatments, I was a worm on the floor in excruciating pain 24 hours daily, only able to sleep 6-10 minutes before I would awaken in greater excruciating pain. I suffered other severe side effects from all of the medical treatments. When I began drinking raw milk and raw carrot juice, my symptoms immediately began to diminish little by little. After awhile, I notice that when I drank more raw milk than carrot juice, I experienced less pain. When I drank more carrot juice than raw milk, I suffered more.
ALL health departments and universities are controlled by medically indoctrinated propaganda. They have only drops of objectivity when it comes to their brainwashed bacteria-phobic thought processes. Every bodily process occurs by the interaction of numerous species of bacteria, intercellularly, and bodily fluids; that includes everything that happens in the body. We are 150 bacteria genes to every 1 human gene. We are about 1/2% human and 99.5% bacteria. The concept that bacteria cause diseases is called the germ-theory. It entails the ludicrous notion that a tiny colony of certain bacteria can willy-nilly overwhelm the the body, even cause the body to attack itself. That is as accurate as a small village of 200 natives with primitive weapons arresting and annihilating all of the people in the United States of America. This sort of thing only happens in fictional movies. It is an absurdity. Why? Because out minds are literally turned against natural truth.
The bacteria that is being accused of causing diseases (so-called “pathogenic”) are actually cellular janitors, that is, they cleanup organic waste. The medical profession and laboratories put live animal cells in an unnatural industrial chemical, fluid environment that sustains cellular life but denigrates it simultaneously. Cells that are not in their natural biological fluids degenerate. The bacteria that are naturally part of the cleansing of such degeneration are propagated within the cells, coming out of hibernation so-to-speak to eat or transform the chemically damaged tissue of the cells. In laboratories, Petri-dish observers see that the cells are being eaten and or dissolved by the cleansing (janitorial) bacteria and say, “See, those cells are causing cellular disruption and dissolution. They cause disease.” The naturally occurring followup thinking becomes, ” How can we make money off of this? Let’s create millions of weapons of mass destruction that we will call antibiotics, antiseptics and antimicrobials. We’ll make a fortune.”
The role of bacteria
Do we blame the janitors for the waste they clean? Some day soon, I hope that people will awaken and realize that industrial chemicals, including those formed by cooking and processing, cause all diseases – and stop blaming bacteria. Bacteria are never the problem. However, their waste can be highly toxic when bacteria are fed foods containing industrial chemicals. Bacteria are supposed to be 90% of digestion. Their waste is our food that we absorb. When the bacteria eat foods with gross toxins, they release those toxins as a natural product of the toxic food. They are not to blame but the chemical farmers and processors are to blame. If people acknowledge those facts, who would they find to buy non-organic and processed food, and medical drugs? Our politicians and business people say the economy is at stake so to hell with health, let’s keep up the economy. Is the economy more important than living in a healthy body? That is a question each of us must answer.
The drugs that cause most disease are vaccines. Every ingredient is toxic in every vaccine. Together, the ingredients are a soup of toxins that have no proof of effectiveness. There are pages of science that prove those toxins cause illness and disease in laboratory animals. The reason that those toxins may seem to work in some people is that the body stops the janitorial bacteria from cleaning old organic waste and accumulated toxins. Most bodies focus on the immediate toxins from vaccines. It will take a body many years to handle, neutralize, eliminate or store those toxins from a direct injection of toxic fluids. So the normal diseases that result from toxic living are temporarily subdued but increasing. The people who benefit are all of those who invest and work in medically-related fields while decaying the health of people. If everyone were healthy, medical-related businesses and employees would be out of business and work. Only if you are sick, do they profit. Do you really think they want you healthy?
One more critic about the Raw Deal article: the author and/or editors failed to investigate the validity of Sharon Palmer’s response that all of the thousands of dollars of commercial food she bought were sold to restaurants, not farmers’ markets and Rawesome. Did the author contact the restaurants and verify Palmer’s statement? The author failed to contact the employees who testified that the commercial food Palmer bought were sold at farmers’ markets and Rawesome. She sold them as being truly organic Grass-fed food.
When I speak of organic, I do not refer to USDA’s corrupt version of organic that allows hundreds of industrial chemicals to enter the grounds that grow plants and animals for food as long as it does not exceed 15%. Fifteen percent chemicals can and does cause massive harm to animal cells, most often gradually but sometimes immediately. Those are the chemically-laced commercial foods that Palmer peddled as truly organically grass-fed raised on her farm products. Go to:
www.UnhealthyFamilyFarms.com to see much of the facts in this case. James Stewart was complicit in distributing that commercial toxic food to all Rawesome’s trusting members.
James Stewart, Sharon Palmer and Rawesome – Where things went wrong
James Stewart and Sharon Palmer robbed, cheated and stole from all of it members but the worst of their actions was that they harmed the health of people who consumed those chemically tainted foods. They harmed the people with the very products that people joined Rawesome to avoid. James got off track many years ago and let’s hope he gets back on track, at least with his own foods. I will never trust him again. For 2 years, he told me repeatedly that Sharon’s products were completely organic by my standards and completely raised on Sharon’s farm. He stated I was being irrational and ridiculous to question the quality of those foods. Often he screamed at me at Rawesome in front of many members. The investigators I hired and the Los Angeles City investigators found that Sharon had peddling the commercial foods for at least 2 years, to Rawesome members and people at farmer’s markets.
I have been criticized and ostracized for reporting Stewart’s and Palmer’s criminal behavior to the police. They left me no choice. I approached them about the quality of foods produced at Sharon’s farm for 2 years but most often they yelled at me. If I hadn’t stopped them, members would still be defrauded into consuming the poison they thought they were avoiding at very high prices. I worked so hard to achieve the best quality of food possible by working with our Amish suppliers to Rawesome. I visited the farms in Pennsylvania. They changed their farming habits to accommodate exactly what I found was best because it was common sense farming. However, it is only common sense when you extricate your mind from agricultural-brainwashing produced by the food and chemical industries.
James Stewart did not have any significant experience in farming. His experience involved acquiring food and food sales. He is not the protector that he purports to be. He simply peddles the food for which others establish quality. People need to realize that Stewart has harmed our food movement immeasurably. He did not leave me a choice but to stop him the way I did. If he had truly been about our right-to-food-choices movement, he would not have supplied toxic commercial food and sold it a high prices to people he had contracted with to not supply those industrial foods. He did not take the brave road as the farmers Vernon Hershberger and Micheal Schmidt did. Vernon and Michael were ready to go to jail for the well-fare of Rawesome members and the right to healthy food. Instead, James opted to take actions resulting in the closing of our club, depriving us of Rawesome and put all other raw food clubs in the country in jeopardy. For other people’s sake, I hope that James Stewart has changed for the better, if ever in the future he supplies food to people who care for their health.
healthfully,
aajonus vonderplanitz, ph.d nutrition
