Author Topic: Study claims CR is better than IF dieting  (Read 2686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TylerDurden

  • Global Moderator
  • Mammoth Hunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,016
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Raw Paleolithic Diet
"During the last campaign I knew what was happening. You know, they mocked me for my foreign policy and they laughed at my monetary policy. No more. No more.
" Ron Paul.

Offline Projectile Vomit

  • Mammoth Hunter
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,027
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Study claims CR is better than IF dieting
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2012, 04:07:14 am »
Nice find, thanks for the link. I just downloaded the PDF from Elsevier and will give it a read.

Offline Ferocious

  • Bear Hunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 171
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Study claims CR is better than IF dieting
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2012, 06:05:37 am »

Offline Projectile Vomit

  • Mammoth Hunter
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,027
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Study claims CR is better than IF dieting
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2012, 07:06:51 am »
IF is intermittent fasting (or intermittent feeding, as it's used in the article TD linked to). This means allowing modest periods of time (up to a day or two) to pass between meals once in a while. CR is caloric restraint, which means deliberately and commonly eating a lower than normal caloric intake each day. They are both about reducing caloric intake, but differ in their frequency (IF is less common caloric reduction while CR or more common).

Offline cobalamin

  • Trapper
  • **
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: Study claims CR is better than IF dieting
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2012, 02:29:32 am »
Quote
Furthermore, we show that intermittent feeding can lead to oxidative insulin receptor inactivation and glucose intolerance.

So can inactivity.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk