I was pointing out that it was laughable for a politician to scream rabidly about nuking Iran when they do not even have a clue where it is on a map, or even have a clue about its history, recent or otherwise. As far as starting wars is concerned, Iran has not done so for a very long time historically, whereas the US and Israel have done so repeatedly in the last 60+ years, so there is no rational reason for being Iran-phobic.
As regards politics/religion, I have been on other forums where politics and religion forums have been omnipresent. Admittedly, most such forums tended to be boring, tedious ones where virtually all members were of the same political mindset. In the case of RVAF diet forums, you cannot simply wipe out all political discussions. For example, the raw dairy movement is big in the US and to a lesser extent elsewhere, with RVAF forums often indulging in petitions to US State Governors etc. over the issue. There have been other attempts to wipe out healthy food sources by governments. For example, Argentina's past Socialist governments have almost wiped out the formerly thriving grassfed meat industry in that country, and that is just one among many such cases. I pity any Venezuelan RVAFers at this moment etc.
Religion is a lesser issue, here. However, I think it is reasonable to include it. For example, someone might state that they are a Buddhist or whatever and ask how they can fit their religious dietary doctrine within RVAF diet guidelines.
We probably have been discussing non-dietary stuff more than before. Unsurprising, in a way, since most RVAF diet topics have already been covered so that many people just have to search rawpaleoforum in order to find the thread with the right dietary information in it they need. As regards laws, those are best for totalitarian societies. I believe in a genuine diversity of opinions. I would not personally even mind conversing with a Muslim RVAF diet follower who was a supporter of IS, if such existed.
