Calm down tyler and stop with the attacks, please. I can assure you I am not a troll lol.
So your first link I have definitely never seen before and is pretty interesting, boiled meats do seem to be somewhat high at first glance. The problem is that raw meat already has a decent amount of AGE content for some reason, raw chicken for example is 700 and boiled is 950(compared to 5000 for roasted).
*sigh* I already explained in previous discussions with you and others, why some raw foods had high AGE-content. It has been pointed out that animals fed on unhealthy foods like grains, tend to provide such high-AGE content. That does not invalidate raw foods as a whole, it just means one should eat high quality foods.
Plant foods on the other hand have negligible amounts with boiled potatoes coming in at 17, this was what I was really interested in because cooked meat has other greater problems besides AGEs so the AGE content doesn't necessarily matter too much(to me at least).
As usual, you are ignoring all the other types of heat-created toxins created by cooking.
Your second link is pretty classic, especially considering that you are calling me stupid. Its a study done on mice with refined AGEs, you seriously think that is equal to a study done on healthy humans? If there are studies done on relatively healthy humans show them, otherwise stop with the attacks.
First of all, it is spectacularly stupid for you to insist on studies on healthy peoples since the whole point of AGEs is that they are toxic and implicated in numerous different illnesses, so that, inevitably, almost all studies will focus on AGEs in unhealthy people/animals. The vast majority of studies on healthy subjects would, inevitably, be done on animals, for obvious reasons. Even so, given the 1000s of studies done on AGEs, there are some studies done on healthy subjects, eg:-
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16037267http://alcalc.oxfordjournals.org/content/39/4/316.fullWhat is trollish is to pretend that studies done on unhealthy subjects are somehow "suspect", especially when I have previously, on several occasions, pointed to a study which showed that reducing AGE-levels made such ill people healthier.
I'm a liar because I realize that these studies aren't absolute and can be wrong? Ok... You need to chill out dude, your dogma with this AGE thing is beyond insane. No need to attack me over it lol, I'm actually trying to learn as hard as that may be to believe
What irritates is when someone continues to nitpick my data despite already having previously read past posts of mine which already debunked your claims, ages ago.
Again diabetic patients aren't representative of healthy humans, just because a diabetic patient is worse off doesn't mean anything for healthy people. With that being said so far everything you posted has not proven that AGE are a problem for healthy people or that health problems reduce when AGEs are eliminated.
I already previously showed in past posts months before, without doubt, that health problems do indeed reduce when AGE-levels are reduced. As regards AGEs-levels in healthy peoples comment, that's stupid, as the whole point behind AGEs is not that they are instantly toxic, but that their negative effects increase to the point where they become toxic, after enough AGEs have been produced over the years. After all, the body naturally produces very tiny amounts of AGEs, regardless of diet, throughout life, and the body can deal with them, just not with the accumulated burden of toxins from cooked foods, over decades.
Before you ban me or attack me anymore let me make it clear that I don't even eat foods with AGEs for the most part and I think they may be a causal factor in some diseases but your weak studies you parade around don't show much, they definitely don't show Dietary AGEs being the villain you make them ut to be.
That is, of course pure b*ll. More to the point, there are now so many 1000s of studies done on the negative effects of AGEs, that it should by now be required for every person who wishes to troll me re heat-created toxins to read up on the first 500 studies on heat-created toxins they come across, beforehand.