The problem is that the vegans are also trying to force their way of life on others on a legal front. There is Paul McCartney and his "Meatless Mondays" campaign which is claimed to be environmentally-friendly and where the idea is that school canteens and government canteens should all have no animal food available on Mondays. In fact, of course, modern agriculture as regards plants is in many ways as or more environmentally-damaging as raising animals.
Actually, it should not only be the concern of raw meat eaters, but the Meat Industry should fight against the vegans on a legal front, along with the cooked meat eaters.
Anyhow, I think that Meat Industry does not have such strong arguments against the Vegans and therefore meat industry would not be able to convince the masses against the vegans.
Only Raw Meat Eaters have more convincing arguments than the vegans. Thus only raw meat eaters could win the legal battle or mass convincing battle against vegans.
Moreover, I doubt that Sverige fought this case properly. He was absent from the court personally.
The only heavy argument from vegans was this that child was shocked to see people eating squirrel.
Counter argument is:
* Children also get shocked when one animal attacks another and kill it.
Therefore, children could not be banned from watching one animal killing the other, but children are taught to understand the nature in order to come out of this shock.
* Children also get shocked when they see any deer (or any animal) is shot by the hunter. Then should we also ban hunting?
* Children also get shocked when they see animals are slaughtered in the slaughter houses. So, should we also ban all the slaughter houses while they could shock the children?
No, but children are taught that many people consider meat as natural diet for humans and thus they have the RIGHT to slaughter animals for their consumption.
In the same way, if any child shocked to see people eating raw meat on the street, then children should be taught that it is their food and they have the right to eat it while they consider it natural diet for them.
Western Vegans VS Indian Vegans: It seems that most of the western vegans are only against getting beefs from the cows. But they have no problem in getting MILK from them.
It is same with the Indian vegans.
It results in millions of stray cows on the streets of India, which are old enough to not give milk, but could also not be slaughtered due to the religion.
In West too, if old milk cows are not slaughtered, then there will be millions of old cows and no one would want to feed them as they would be useless.
But if vegans are ok with the slaughter of old milk cows, then they should also have no problem with the slaughter of cows for beef.
