I'm still not convinced we should be drinking these vast quantities of water. I've been trying to up my intake but it doesn't
feel right if I'm really having to force myself to do it! Surely we need to be relying on our instincts here a little?! I haven't looked at those Dextery links yet but will do so when I get a chance.
Lex, in one of my studies regarding re-hydration, it seems we can only utilize so much water during a certain period of time. So frequency is better than just one bulk drinking (drink every 30 mins). The water cure by batmanghelj uses salt. Don't know how salt fits into zero carb.
I'm still currently using salt, gs, on my vlc regime. I read batmanghelj's books a long time ago too and do add a pinch of celtic salt to my water flask. I find that I do much better when I do this compared to when I don't. But, much of what we do, of course, depends upon the unique state of our bodies and, having previously suffered from adrenal insufficiency, salt retention is/has been an issue for me personally.
Lex, I found a research article that said the Inuit sweated a lot (which I find amazing in the Arctic). This could account for the 5-6 liter figure, though I still find that unbelievably high. Just 2.5 or more liters a day seems to stretch my bladder painfully--especially if I don't get enough out before sleeping.
I seem to recall reading that much of the sweating was done in their igloos with the internal temperatures becoming sufficiently hot. Likewise, I'm really struggling to up my intake and am still only managing to drink 1-1.5 ltrs per day.
They also seem to support the link of lack of water to kidney stones but they don't give much detail.
I recently came across a wonderful article on insulin resistance by Dr Ron Rosedale MD
http://nourishedmagazine.com.au/blog/articles/insulin-resistance-the-real-culprit. I don't know if it's ever been discussed here before but it seems to contain some great information clearly presented. A highly recommended read even if some of his dietary conclusions leave a little to be desired.
The point that I found relevant to this particular discussion was this:
The medical profession just assume a Calcium supplement has a homing device and it knows to go into your bone. What happens if you high levels of insulin and you take a bunch of calcium? Most of it is just going to go out in your urine. You would be lucky if that were the case because that part which doesn’t does not have the instructions to go to your bone because the anabolic hormones aren’t working. This is first of all because of insulin, then because of the IGF’s from growth hormone, also testosterone and progesterone, they are all controlled by insulin and when they are insulin resistant they can’t listen to any of the anabolic hormones. So your body doesn’t know how to build tissue anymore, so some of the calcium may end up in your bone, but a good deal of it will end up everywhere else. Metastatic calcifications, including in your arteries.
Lex, I'm sure you've already considered this but perhaps the development of your stones took place during previous inappropriate diets and are only being shifted now by the body as it's given the nutrients and conditions to repair itself? The water factor could be a total red herring?! I think the above discussion (particularly when read in context of the whole article) gives a clue to what the root cause of the stone development may have been initially.