I was and am still wondering about our need for salt and how the body makes "hydrochloric acid". This is an answer I got from Peter's "Hyperlipid Blogg" (vet):
Nicola said...
Hi Peter,
It is said that we need extra salt to digest cooked meat / protein.
I don't know for shore and when I ask others some believe we need salt but don't know for shore. Those following a raw meat diet claim that salt is not needed.
How do animals on a natural diet of raw meat make hydrochloric acid?
Peter said...
Nicola,
I'm not really sure where the question comes from. As I understand it the enzyme carbonic anhydrase splits H2CO3 in parietal cells to give a bicarbonate ion (which ends up in the plasma pool in exchange for a chloride ion) and an H+ ion which is pumped in to the gastric lumen with the Cl- ion. The bicarbonate ion, as NaHCO3, is used to neutralise the HCl in the small intestine giving NaCl. NaCl is easily absorbed from the intestine. I can see no net loss of sodium or chloride here. So is the cooked meat supposed to be doing something to this cycle which raw meat doesn't?
Beyond me.
BTW extracellular fluid is sodium and chloride rich, there is a fair amount in meat, especially if you drink the gravy. Our kidneys have phenomenal powers of sodium retention on a zero added salt diet. Serious sodium disturbance is fatal. I spend half my life pouring salty water of assorted compositions in to the veins of patients in which the control system has gone wrong for various reasons.
Peter
Nicola said...
Hello Peter,
The real human diet is a totally carnivorous one...but when it comes to salt?
http://tinyurl.com/6kouyphttp://tinyurl.com/589yulDo you believe/know if raw or cooked meat needs extra salt for our body to produce hydrochloric acid and meet all body needs?
Nicola
Peter said...
I would agree that it is possible to be healthy eating a totally carnivorous diet but I personally doubt very much that it has been the pattern for humans world wide.
To reject vegetable food complepetely would be too wasteful of available resources. This seems as contrarian as the vegan approach, except the full vegans do not seem to be healthy long term (not that I know any) unless they supplement, where as full carnivory allows this.
Re salt, digestion cycles salt. Those who suggest cooking increases total body salt requirement need a mechanism. Without that it smells like religion to me. Full carnovores are perfectly well able to extract the 160mmol of salt from extracellular fluid and a few more mmol from intracellular fluid. Zero sodium urine is well within the ability of humans, dogs and cats.
Where is the physiology to base the discussion around?
Peter
So how do you people understand Peter?
Nicola