It all depends. If we were to check the statistics by relying on online forum activity then our forum easily surpasses most or all of the cooked-palaeodiet forums. Paleofood, for example, has far fewer daily posts and just c.280-odd members. The yahoo groups cooked-palaeodiets have similiar numbers(no idea re cavemanforum, the no1 cooked-paleodiet forum, but I think we have more members). Also, like Alphagruis said, how long people stay on such diets is the key. I would guess that most cooked-palaeos merely temporarily dabble in the diet for weight-loss reasons and the like and often quit the diet,whereas rawists are far more likely to stick to a mostly-raw diet given better health-results, plus they've usually only discovered RVAF diets once they've already tried and failed with all other dietary combinations.
Whatever the case, we should be aiming to have as many rawpalaeos as there are raw vegans as the latter far outnumber the cooked-palaeos anyway, and a raw vegan diet, IMO, is closer to us re dietary beliefs(well, that is, it's easier , on a psychological level, for someone to consider transferring from a raw vegan diet to a raw, palaeolithic diet than it is for someone to switch from a cooked, palaeo diet to a rawpalaeo diet).
