No GS, not having it. You know as well as I do that making statements like
are provocative and are going to inspire discussion, and you are also answering as if solving all the illls of humanity with many of your arguments, so saying you're just giving facts is disingenuous.
If you think the discussion should stay practical fine bring up NFP, but let's have some even handedness...don't open up this kind of wider discussion then try and shut it down when you don't like it.
Oh so you wanna go back to that topic?
Ok.
Well it's hardly fanciful imagining. You don't have to be a sociologist, just think for yourself what the consequences would be if everyone started doing it without birth control.
I was not suggesting this at all.
Talking about NFP is a bit of a u-turn GS as you said 'Have sexual relations if open to pregnancy.'
NFP is a VALID CHOICE.
ABSTINENCE is another valid choice.
You misunderstood me.
You can do NFP if you want, but the majority of people around the world can't handle it, they'll just have kids.
Anyone reading this has to make their OWN CHOICE.
You cannot make that choice for them.
You CANNOT tell them that "they can't handle it."
I believe in FREEDOM TO CHOOSE.
---------
So these are my perceived choices:
NOT HARMFUL contraception / birth control?
#1 - No sex = not harmful... but not enjoyable
#2 - Condom = not harmful... but not enjoyable either
#3 - NFP (this is the 21st century) = not harmful... but you have to follow the schedule, plus learn body signals, temperature, mucus quality
#4 - the rest of the bunch = all harmful
There you have it. My honest answers.
It's Nicole's body and Nicole's decision.