I am not VLC (eat fruits and veggies) but I still get AT LEAST half my calories from fat (usually more then half)

Fat is very calorie dense I don't have to eat much of it, by mass my fat would look so much smaller then the muscle meat, liquids and plant matter...just eat the small amount of fats that come on the sides of my meats, in my ground bison, a piece of fatty raw cheese and 1 tablespoon of flax oil, once in a while I eat some bone marrow or a little cod oil, or a few fatty nuts or fatty salmon.
Compared by volume, you could say I hardly ever eat much fat, but still thats where a big part of my calories are from, if that fat wasn't there I'd be having some big issues. On the other hand I tried forcefully eating more animal fat and felt sluggish and just...not well.
You'll know if you're eating too much fat (sluggish, nauseous etc) or too little fat (tired, hungry, craving too much fruits), everyones requirement is different especially with all the different activity levels and exercises.
I don't care if I am burning sugar or fat or both, sugar from fruits gives me quick energy and burns fast, then after thats done all those precious fats I ate come in handy, then I am burning fat (= I like to use both for energy, but if I had to choose just one, I'd burn FAT, it lasts longer!
I don't know why there are so many arguments about how much fat one should eat, I thought that with the raw animal diet this becomes VERY intuitive/instinctive, who cares about measuring the fat just eat it but don't gorge on it! IF you are Zero-carb THEN you may need a little more then average well thats just obvious no?