Author Topic: Study seems to show that CR is far more useful than IF  (Read 2184 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline TylerDurden

  • Global Moderator
  • Mammoth Hunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,016
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Raw Paleolithic Diet
Study seems to show that CR is far more useful than IF
« on: August 12, 2011, 04:17:17 am »
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21816219

I still wouldn't advise doing CR given its appalling side-effects.
"During the last campaign I knew what was happening. You know, they mocked me for my foreign policy and they laughed at my monetary policy. No more. No more.
" Ron Paul.

Offline Projectile Vomit

  • Mammoth Hunter
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,027
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Study seems to show that CR is far more useful than IF
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2011, 05:27:51 am »
What appalling side effects?

Offline TylerDurden

  • Global Moderator
  • Mammoth Hunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,016
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Raw Paleolithic Diet
Re: Study seems to show that CR is far more useful than IF
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2011, 05:57:39 am »
What appalling side effects?
  Caloric restriction, according to many people who've done it, results in weakened muscle-mass and low skeletal density, among other issues:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie_restriction#Health_concerns
"During the last campaign I knew what was happening. You know, they mocked me for my foreign policy and they laughed at my monetary policy. No more. No more.
" Ron Paul.

Offline raw-al

  • Mammoth Hunter
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,961
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Study seems to show that CR is far more useful than IF
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2011, 04:48:01 pm »
I recall a conversation with my Vaidya when this topic was raised. He said that CR weakens the person. Appropriate foods are the answer.
Cheers
Al

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk