A better analogy would be that the US is the evil "Federation" with Ron Paul and a few others representing the "Liberator's" crew, as in the Blake's 7 universe. It's a more realistic interpretation of the chances of Ron Paul winning anyway...
Never could stand either Star Trek/Star Wreck or Star Wars. Star Trek was all about how absolutely "wonderful"
it was to impose the evil of American Liberalism on other alien planets, happily destroying alien cultures because humans were supposedly morally "superior" to everybody else; then there was the really bad acting involved in the shows, and the irritation caused by the fact that the aliens in Star Wreck all looked exactly like humans with just the minor difference of a few fake-looking skull-ridges or pointy ears - at least Babylon 5 made an effort in the 1st season and introduced an insectoid alien as a character. Reminds me of John W Campbell, the great SF editor, who similiarly stubbornly insisted that all SF stories in his SF magazine which featured either aliens or artificial intelligences, had to always end with the humans winning the fight every time, due to the humans' supposedly superior intellect or whatever nonsense. The result is that many of that magazine's stories really stank in terms of bad writing etc.
Star Wars was just as bad. The only decent, 3-dimensional characters in Star Wars were Han Solo, the Emperor and Darth Vader, and possibly Obi Wan Kenobi(the Alec Guinness version only!). The only truly decent film in that genre was the Empire Strikes Back. Sadly, I watched the 3 prequels out of boredom and have regretted it since. Harrison Ford once, tellingly, said about George Lucas's writing ability re Star Wars:- "George, you can type this shit, but you sure as hell can't say it."
I happen to be an SF aficionado, and I feel like weeping when I go into the Science Fiction section of a book-store and find half of the book-shelves in that section devoted to the drivel that is Star Wars and Star Trek.