There's a movie on netflix called "beer" that credits beer with extraordinary things including the advent of agriculture.
Yes, I mentioned that above, but I see the advent of monoculture agriculture as more of a negative thing, healthwise, than something meriting credit. I don't drink or advocate beer. I've found artisinal mead and unpasteurized sake to be much less problematic for me than beer. I suspect that I wouldn't handle even unpasteurized ale (real ale, aka cask ale) very well, due to gluten content and my low tolerance for grains in general. I might give it a try some day, though.
One of the things Brian also said was that he had read that a lot of the research saying that a couple of drinks a day was funded by the alcohol industry so you have to be really careful to make sure that no one doing the research has something to gain by particular results.
Yup, the study reported in Time Magazine that I linked to above (Late-Life Alcohol Consumption and 20-Year Mortality
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017200,00.html#ixzz203Ku7eMb) was "funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and the Department of Veterans Affairs." (
http://www.disabled-world.com/fitness/moderate-drinking.php#ixzz203aakahm). I doubt that they were happy with the results, which makes them all the more credible. The study "controlled for confounding factors such as previous problem drinking" (
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100824161432.htm). However, the studies on alcohol consumption have all been observational studies, from which we can't draw conclusions. The best they can do is suggest inferences to investigate with further study.
I'd actually put more stock in the fact that the anti-alcohol people haven't been able to produce solid studies showing shortened lifespan and increased mortality from moderate intakes of alcoholic beverages and perhaps even more significantly, the evidence suggests that humans have been consuming (raw) fermented and even mildly alcoholic fruits and honey throughout our entire history and beyond (as a recent linked article showed, even orangutans intentionally ferment durian fruits, producing alcohol), and that hormesis in general has lots of supporting research (
http://www.rawpaleodietforum.com/omnivorous-raw-paleo/fermented-fruit/msg88859/#msg88859).
The most counter-intuitive thing reported so far is that even heavy drinkers tend to outlive teetotalers (but not moderate drinkers), according to the studies:
Even though heavy drinking is associated with higher risk for cirrhosis and several types of cancer (particularly cancers in the mouth and esophagus), heavy drinkers are less likely to die than people who don't drink, even if they never had a problem with alcohol.
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017200,00.html#ixzz203Ku7eMb
Of course, the key correlating factor for optimal lifespan was moderating intake, which some people find unmanageable with alcoholic beverages. And as with everything, buyer beware and YMMV, so I'm not advocating anything for other people, just pondering this stuff and checking for what other folks have found. The orangutan article was particularly interesting.
The research was not done on raw paleos obviously - so this information on many different species matched with our long history with alcohol as a species means more to me actually than the modern research.
Yes, same here.
Oh - and of course - natural vs chemicalized versions - 2 totally separate things to me.
Quite right. All alcoholic beverages are not the same.
the bad news is that it has "coconut flavors" and stevia in it
Yeah, it's not perfect. They do claim that it's "raw," though.
the different bottles with flavors like pomegranate were less natural.
Yes, I don't drink those.
I was thinking though that it might be a good starter for some fresh coconut milk/water.
I might try that, though according to a source that Chris Kresser linked to, coconut water doesn't ferment as readily, nor the culture live as long, as in other media, like sugar-water or maple-syrup-water. Apparently, people who ferment coconut water tend to add kefir culture from sugar-water to it.
I was thinking though that fermented coconut milk compared to regular coconut milk might similar to honey compared to fermented honey or grapes compared to wine - might become a very different kind of experience and might help one to relax rather than pace.
This is how the coconut beverages I tried rank in digestibility and after-effects for me, with best at the top:
Kevita raw fermented coconut water
100% raw coconut water
Flash-pasteurized coconut water
Flash-pasteurized coconut milk
I haven't noticed any direct benefits from any of these, yet, but the Kevita is enjoyable enough that it encourages me to consume more liquids and to avoid other probably less-healthy beverage temptations, which was a goal of mine--thus, an indirect benefit. I was hoping the probiotic aspect might provide some additional benefits, but I can't say I've noticed any benefits from any probiotic food, aside from improved digestibility, other than raw fermented honey and eating mostly raw in general.
Are there traditional fermented alcoholic drinks using coconuts?
There's tuak in the Philippines, which is made from coconut tree sap and is further distilled into arrack:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrack#Coconut_arrackThe sugar content of coconut water is reportedly too low to be very useful for making alcoholic beverages, but there's enough to make it into vinegar (which I have).