bill clinton pretends hes a vegan to push globalist anti meat agenda

[svrn]

You're funny Troll. More women are in college, but not in power! Those are two different things entirely. There's not going to be a complete reversal of gender roles until men can give birth to babies. There might be a more equal distribution, but not reversal. If there were a complete reversal it would destroy the mechanism of the globalists controls.

But this thread wasn't about women too was it? You guys sure love talking about us.

part of the globalist endgame is to end people giving birth to other people. They want to produce babies in laboratories like they did in Brave New World so ability to give birth is irrelevant.

[svrn]

as far as the real modern medicine goes here is an interview that may give you some insight. I cant vouch for its validity but it is quite interesting. Its the first thing that came to mind. I will look for something better later.

Project Camelot interviews Dr Pete Peterson - part 1 of 3

[Dorothy]

part of the globalist endgame is to end people giving birth to other people. They want to produce babies in laboratories like they did in Brave New World so ability to give birth is irrelevant.

Oh - ok. I think I need a quick globalist reader to be up on all the plans for my future. Women will be in power with no natural babies. Is there a time-line for this? I'm gathering no more war? Women have always been more generally against it than men.

Do you have a quick read digest link for me Troll?

[svrn]

read brave new world by aldous huxley. This is the world they have planned for us, with a bit of 1984 thrown in as well but I believe it will be closer to brave new world. The author of bnw is the brother of Julian Huxley who directed unesco and created the world wildlife fund. The Huxleys, Darwins, and Wedgewoods would only breed with each other so you know that Huxley is part of one of the most powerful families in the world.

Basically read brave new world and you will see what the author reveals to us based on his knowledge of the plan for the world.

And there will be no more need for war in a one world government. War is currently being used to get us to that goal and once the entire planet is enslaved it will no longer be necessary. This is not necessarily a good thing.

[Dorothy]

Women now earn more the men...more women graduate college..live longer...get better health care...more benefits...more time off...preferential custody and divorce arrangements...

Many men are without jobs. Especially in construction..trades...men are getting lazier because the cards are stacked against them.

Missed this one Wodg.

More benefits and time off? Site something please because that's not what I read or see - in America.

More women have graduated from college for a while now, but they still make less for the same work. That's why this is being called a "manpression" because the people that are getting paid more for the same work are the ones that are getting fired - the system can no longer afford to pay them more for the same thing. It's true what you say about men not being able to get jobs now. The women were already there at lower wages so didn't get fired. It wasn't that the women got the jobs that men were willing to do at the same wage. There are pretty not much in the way of new jobs these days in general. The whole system really sucks.

Does it make a difference that most of the brokers and power wielders that caused the fiasco in the first place were men making millions off of the suffering masses? Wall Street is still predominantly an old boys club. Not that it would be any honor to be one of them that's for sure - as either a woman or as a man. 

[Dorothy]

read brave new world by aldous huxley. This is the world they have planned for us, with a bit of 1984 thrown in as well but I believe it will be closer to brave new world. The author of bnw is the brother of Julian Huxley who directed unesco and created the world wildlife fund. The Huxleys, Darwins, and Wedgewoods would only breed with each other so you know that Huxley is part of one of the most powerful families in the world.

Basically read brave new world and you will see what the author reveals to us based on his knowledge of the plan for the world.

And there will be no more need for war in a one world government. War is currently being used to get us to that goal and once the entire planet is enslaved it will no longer be necessary. This is not necessarily a good thing.

I read Brave New World and 1984 - twice. But what you are saying seems to be more involved. Women in power is not in either of those books by a long shot. When they were written women were still pretty much enslaved and the concept of women running the world would have been more far out than anything they could think up.

I'm still watching the video you posted. It's very long and it seeming to take forever to get past "this guy knows things he can't say" to something he CAN say.... but I'm plugging along until he gets to some meat... hopefully.

[Dorothy]

Got through it Troll. He's a tough one to listen to. Not much new as he kept on saying how he didn't want to say what he knew - so it was mostly about aliens. 15% of the population has alien dna. I can dig that. But the secret session of Congress I never heard about.

I think I need a different primer. Like an overview that is written or with good editing. You know of anything like that?

[svrn]

I read Brave New World and 1984 - twice. But what you are saying seems to be more involved. Women in power is not in either of those books by a long shot. When they were written women were still pretty much enslaved and the concept of women running the world would have been more far out than anything they could think up.

I'm still watching the video you posted. It's very long and it seeming to take forever to get past "this guy knows things he can't say" to something he CAN say.... but I'm plugging along until he gets to some meat... hopefully.

its not so much about women being in poer as them being in a much larger level of power than they have traditionally. The entire point of this si to destroy traditional gender roles and eventually completely break up the family unit to the point where the state is the your parents.. This was definitly part of brave new world.

If you want tor ead aldous huxley describe himself how bnw is the plan for the future he lays it all out in a brave new world revisited.

The part of the video I wanted you to take note of is the machines that heal people especially through the use of frequencies. We have very low level versions of these for sure. Im not saying this guy is to be trusted, just that a lot of what he says about the real modern medicine is true. It may just be disinformation that uses truth to push propaganda about aliens.

[Dorothy]

Dr. Peterson was just too unspecific. He said he created a machine that evaluated the aura so as to determine what organs were diseases and prescribe medications - far from Rife or vibratory healing. That's when he got into that 15% had alien dna so couldn't be read correctly. It was so murky that it didn't mean much. Rife is not exactly the new modern medicine - it's totally alternative. Is the new modern medicine actually alternative medicine?

Yeah - the breakdown of the family structure was definitely part of Brave New World - big time. Is this done though by giving women more power though? Making women more strong and willing/able to fight for their children because of more confidence doesn't sound like a viable strategy. One of the things it does though is make it so neither parent is home with the children and home schooling is impossible - that way everyone is indoctrinated "properly" - except us 15%ers.

Hey for anyone out there that might be interested in listening to Brave New World - there is a version with Micheal York acting that is superb! It's a thousand times better than reading the book.

Revisted huh? I'll check it out.

[wodgina]

Obviously the gender bender's plan is to put more women in more powerful roles so they have control over greater wealth. Who's at the very top is not important. They are so unbelievable wealthy it doesn't matter... it's the power they enjoy.

If women want to complain they don't earn as much as men and should be powerbrokers at the top then they should start up their own companies. It's not hard, just register your name, organise your structure and off you go...or are we stopping you from doing that too?

I can't think of one start up self made female millionare/billionaire

[Dorothy]

Obviously the gender bender's plan is to put more women in more powerful roles so they have control over greater wealth. Who's at the very top is not important. They are so unbelievable wealthy it doesn't matter... it's the power they enjoy.

If women want to complain they don't earn as much as men and should be powerbrokers at the top then they should start up their own companies. It's not hard, just register your name, organise your structure and off you go...or are we stopping you from doing that too?

I can't think of one start up self made female millionare/billionaire

What an opening! OPRAH!!!!!  So Silly Wodg. Are you DARING me to change back my icon? Tyler is going to get made with you.

What if you are not the kind that WANTS to have your own company? What if you WANT to work on Wall Street? And since women outnumber men - if the only powerful job available was to start your own company then half the population would have to start their own company.

We're not talking about other kinds of isms. Women are unique in that they are a minority that is the majority. You can't say oh - why does that small little group just make their own way.

[wodgina]

The same reason why women are not on Wall Street is the same reason why there are no female Facebook/Apple/Microsoft multi billionaires.

[svrn]

the true modern medicine is not simply alternative medicine. The true modern medicine has unlimited funds at its disposal while alternative medicine is always on a shoestring budget.

[Dorothy]

The same reason why women are not on Wall Street is the same reason why there are no female Facebook/Apple/Microsoft multi billionaires.

Ok - You deserve it! Sorry Tyler - but he's making me do it. I'm changing my picture back to Oprah. Or maybe I'll change it to Muriel Siebret! Don't blame me - if y'all don't want to see the face of a powerful/wealthy woman looking at you (no matter what else you think of her) then tell Wodg to stop saying silly things to taunt me.

For those that don't know - to make it on the stock exchange as a women you have to be 100 times better than the men. Siebret is the best of these.

Outspoken, smart, and determined, Muriel Siebert has made a career out of taking risks. The founder and president of the national discount brokerage firm that bears her name, Siebert became the first woman member of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in 1967. With offices in California and Florida, Muriel Siebert & Co. remains the only female-owned brokerage firm on the exchange. In all of her business dealings, Siebert continues to view risk as opportunity and chides her colleagues for not being more daring. "The men of the top of the industry and government should be more willing to risk sharing leadership with women and minority members who are not merely clones of their white male buddies, " she was quoted as saying in a press release available online at www.msiebert.com. "In these fast-changing times we need the different viewpoints and experiences, we need the enlarged talent bank. The real risk lies in continuing to do things the way they've always been done."

Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/muriel-siebert#ixzz1z0MHG8F7

[Dorothy]

Oh - and sorry Joy/Cherimoya. When you come up with another pic/person - I'll change it. That is if Wodg stops his silliness - otherwise it might go back to Oprah again.

[Dorothy]

the true modern medicine is not simply alternative medicine. The true modern medicine has unlimited funds at its disposal while alternative medicine is always on a shoestring budget.

Yeah - and.......... tell me SOMETHING about it! What is it? Lots more money to do what? What happened to Clinton if he didn't get his stents? What did he do instead? That's a big claim Troll that Clinton is lying about having stents. Give me something, anything - to even entertain the idea that you might be right because saying go read Brave New World aint cutting it for me.

[Dorothy]

There are only a FEW of the facebook/apple/microsoft billionaires! No minorities at all in that lineup. No woman thought up microsoft - but that was only a couple of people who didn't happen to be women. Where there are arenas where there is some competition to get to the top some women have been strong enough to fight the incredible force of discrimination against them:

In the political arena, two Republican candidates for major California seats in the upcoming elections made their names, and their millions, in the tech industry. During gubernatorial candidate and billionaire Meg Whitman's decade-long tenure at eBay ( EBAY - news - people ), the company acquired Internet telephony company Skype (amid much grumbling from the e-populace at large), online ticketing site Stubhub and Rent.com, among other companies.

During senatorial candidate Carly Fiorina's reign as Hewlett-Packard ( HPQ - news - people ) chief executive from 1999 to 2005, company revenues doubled to $88 billion, in large part due to the $19 billion acquisition of rival Compaq Computers. Neither woman is a career politician; both are running on a populist-meets-big-business platform. In a political climate where the Tea Party gains momentum by the day, the approach may pay off.

[svrn]

There is no document I can point to that discusses medical technologies suppressed from the public. Why would this document exist if things were being suppressed.

My evidence is common sense about how the world works. The military is known to use many medical technologies not currently available to the public and this is completely admitted and declassified. Now you if you know anything about our government you should know that whatever is admitted must only be the tip of the iceberg. We know the government is generations ahead of us in every other technological field so why should medicine be any different.

Just think about this. They spray the worlds skies with chemtrails, radiate the planet with nuclear bombs and power plant explosions, destroy the genetic code of the planet with gmos and countless other things. Why would the elites ever do these things to the planet they themselves must live on? The answer is very simple, they have the cures to all of these things or else they would not do it. This is all very simple logic to me and if at this point somebody cant wrap their mind around highly advanced secret medical technology existing then I have no more to say.

Either you get it or you dont.

[Dorothy]

There is no document I can point to that discusses medical technologies suppressed from the public. Why would this document exist if things were being suppressed.

My evidence is common sense about how the world works. The military is known to use many medical technologies not currently available to the public and this is completely admitted and declassified. Now you if you know anything about our government you should know that whatever is admitted must only be the tip of the iceberg. We know the government is generations ahead of us in every other technological field so why should medicine be any different.

Just think about this. They spray the worlds skies with chemtrails, radiate the planet with nuclear bombs and power plant explosions, destroy the genetic code of the planet with gmos and countless other things. Why would the elites ever do these things to the planet they themselves must live on? The answer is very simple, they have the cures to all of these things or else they would not do it. This is all very simple logic to me and if at this point somebody cant wrap their mind around highly advanced secret medical technology existing then I have no more to say.

Either you get it or you dont.

No, you don't get that - I GET IT! But I want something more than "There are secrets"!!! Common sense only goes so far.

Like when you say,  "The military is known to use many medical technologies not currently available to the public and this is completely admitted and declassified."  Who specifically knows that the military is known to use many medical technologies and where have they admitted and declassified what they have?

What good is it sitting around saying "they must have something". What kind of something do they have?

I totally believe that Clinton had stents AND other things. I want to talk more about the things we don't know about. Classified things always leak.

At the same time though Troll - humans are pretty darn dumb about destroying and poisoning themselves. I totally believe that people in power would toxify their own planet until they and their children could no longer live here in order to have power in the short term. I'm not convinced that they have the cure for all the things they are doing to the planet. I'm not sure they really can see that far ahead of themselves.

[wodgina]

Ok - You deserve it! Sorry Tyler - but he's making me do it. I'm changing my picture back to Oprah. Or maybe I'll change it to Muriel Siebret! Don't blame me - if y'all don't want to see the face of a powerful/wealthy woman looking at you (no matter what else you think of her) then tell Wodg to stop saying silly things to taunt me.

For those that don't know - to make it on the stock exchange as a women you have to be 100 times better than the men. Siebret is the best of these.

...So dedicated to her career she never got around to getting married and having a family.

ps you're so easy to stir up

[svrn]

The problem is that you dont understand that for these people the short term is meaningless. How else could the plans of the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776 still be being carried out to this day. The people in their group knew there would be no way they would live to see their dream of a one world government yet they did it anyway and risked everything because these people always think long term.

If you read Carrol Quigleys tragedy and hope you will see that they work in 50-100-1000 year plans and they know turning their world into their own vision will take lots and lots of time.

[svrn]

I try to make a point of not doing research for people because just pulling something up for someone is of little help compared to them having to go find it themselves but I will offer you an article that mentions some military technology still not available to the public: machines that read peoples vitals and deliver custom made drugs.

Now remember this is only what is admitted, the tru medicinal technology is light years ahed of what is admitted. This is common sense.

[Dorothy]

...So dedicated to her career she never got around to getting married and having a family.

ps you're so easy to stir up

So what if she didn't have a family? Maybe she didn't want one. In our country it was almost impossible for a woman to do what she did and have a family and be married because she had to work 100 times harder and longer than any man to do it. It's the culture and system. Or maybe she couldn't have children or whatever. That's why most women wouldn't choose (even if they had what it took) to do what she did - but they might like to get paid the same thing as the man next door when doing the same job better at a Wall Street firm.

And why when I discuss things do you think I am stirred up? What is your definition? What did I say that made you make that comment?  A woman replying to you constitutes her being stirred up?  Why, are you trying to stir me up? If you think my replying to you here is stirred up you have no idea what that really means - at least when it comes to me. I'm totally cool just discussing something with another person that doesn't seem to have a clue hoping to make a dent.

PS - If you don't realize it, you came across as stupendously condescending in your last post.

 

[Dorothy]

I try to make a point of not doing research for people because just pulling something up for someone is of little help compared to them having to go find it themselves but I will offer you an article that mentions some military technology still not available to the public: machines that read peoples vitals and deliver custom made drugs.

Now remember this is only what is admitted, the tru medicinal technology is light years ahed of what is admitted. This is common sense.

Now That's what I'm talking about! Doing research on such subjects takes a lot of time and energy that I don't have atm to do it nor am I all that great at it to tell you the truth or am I emotionally disposed to do so.

It's been decades since I learned that the fed was privately owned in a pamphlet on the stock market. I then spent a month in the law library researching taxes and the fed - and it blew up my world. I realized that I couldn't spend time in that head space and function. Doing research and watching long videos on the ideas you are talking about which I am just generally familiar with is not going to happen for me. But with this medical technology thing you have greatly piqued my interest.

When someone has already done the research and makes a comment that they know about such things - the best way to get to the information is to ask the person to share what they learned from their use of their time and energy. I would very much appreciate it if you shared that article with me.  I'm not the kind of person that has to find things myself to be able to recognize their importance or validity. 

So, where do I find this article?
Thanks.

[wodgina]

So what if she didn't have a family? Maybe she didn't want one. In our country it was almost impossible for a woman to do what she did and have a family and be married because she had to work 100 times harder and longer than any man to do it. It's the culture and system. Or maybe she couldn't have children or whatever. That's why most women wouldn't choose (even if they had what it took) to do what she did - but they might like to get paid the same thing as the man next door when doing the same job better at a Wall Street firm.

And why when I discuss things do you think I am stirred up? What is your definition? What did I say that made you make that comment?  A woman replying to you constitutes her being stirred up?  Why, are you trying to stir me up? If you think my replying to you here is stirred up you have no idea what that really means - at least when it comes to me. I'm totally cool just discussing something with another person that doesn't seem to have a clue hoping to make a dent.

PS - If you don't realize it, you came across as stupendously condescending in your last post.

 

I mean't it to be taken light heartedly