OUTCOME OF TRIAL-We v. 2some plus one?
Aajonus Vonderplan?itz 27/07/2013
To: aajonus
Picture of Aajonus Vonderplanitz
REQUEST for ex-RAWESOME members: Please, all of you who heard James
Stewart state that all of the foods in Rawesome were all raw and
organic, or all of the food from HFF was organic without soy or
chemicals, please email me asap. There were 1,200 of you that told me in
person, on phone calls and emails over the last 3 years. I would like to
receive your confirmation again in your email. Discover why below. Thank
you.
Hi, health-giving food lovers,
The trial of Otting/Vonderplanitz v Stewart/Palmer that alleged slander,
libel, food-fraud and conversion (embezzlement) of membership fees
failed for a number of reasons. The last-straw reason was that Judge
Green disallowed a jury to hear the case. The chance of having many good
minds weigh the evidence vanished. It was going to be only the
government-official Judge Green who would decide the case. He had
completely undermined my case very early and there was no benefit for us
to pursue the case with him.
It had been obvious to 2 attorneys through the last year that Judge
Green was protecting Sharon from the beginning. Considering the evidence
against them, Sharon and James' attorney did not want a jury trial. So,
at the pretrial conference a week prior to trial, their attorney
dismissed their request for jury trial. My attorney argued to continue
as scheduled with a jury trial but Judge Green said no. Ninety-percent
of Green's decision fell to Sharon even though most of them violated
procedure.
Literally, Judge Green robbed from those of us who really care about
truth and pure health-giving organic food a fair and just trial. Why?
Considering that 6 USA-based governmental agencies, plus one Canadian
were involved in the Rawesome-closure and dismantle, spending tens of
millions of dollars to stop food-freedom, governmental agencies intended
and still intend to destroy all those who fight for food-freedom and
those who execute it. This case involved elements of that battle.
Since I have been a key player in food-freedom for 4 decades by having
fought successfully at legislative levels, written reports, having
developed successful Constitutionally protected food-club and farmer
contracts that have been effective with jury trials in stopping
governmental overreach on private food clubs and farms, brought
thousands of citizens together with many farmers, I am somewhat of an
obstruction to governments' power-grab.
Rawesome and Miller Organic Farm was the first food-club contractual
marriage that I established and protected from 2006-2010. When 6
whistleblower witnesses testified that James Stewart, who co-created and
managed Rawesome, and Sharon Palmer, a would-be farmer were involved in
food-fraud, I tried to investigate and stop it. Instead, I and the
whistleblowers were banned from Rawesome by James Stewart. I had helped
build Rawesome from its garage days in 1999 to its heyday with my
patient-base, labor and expertise through 2010.
I was the only figure keeping Rawesome out of the clutches of
governmental overreach every time they attacked James or Rawesome. It
was revealed in a book that was published less than 2 months ago that
governments had been tapping every method of my communications for
years, especially emails because that is how I communicate most. I like
paper-trails of correspondence in case anything stated is questioned
and/or contested.
However, the core issue was and is that Stewart and Palmer allegedly
sold commercial food full of soy and GMO corn as beyond organic, soy and
GMO-free to my patients and others at Rawesome and farmers' markets.
According to irrefutable testimony with solid documents, Palmer and
Stewart food-fraud endangered and risked many people's health.
James personally promised to me that all HFF eggs and chickens were
beyond organic almost every time I got my food at Rawesome, at least 40
times in the period that he chose to buy and sell Sharon's commercial
food. I asked almost every time and he never told me otherwise.
Sharon emphatically assured me on at least 6 occasions the she did not
feed her chickens ANY soy or commercial industrial food. To this day,
they lie about their food fraud. However, they certainly did not want to
go to court on the subject even though the judge had stacked the deck in
their favor. They had all the charges of libel from
UnhealthyFamilyFarm.com but did not want to pursue it. Of course, they
would have been completely exposed.
I gave up UnhealthyFamilyFarm.com website because Judge Green was going
to sanction Larry for having sold it to me when he had promised that he
would dismantle it in a previous agreement with Sharon's attorney. Do
not fret though, someone purchased UnhealthyFamilyFarm.org on which s/he
will mount all of the evidence including video testimonies of key witnesses.
Governments could not allow this trial to take place either, whether
civil or criminal. Everyone knew that this trial, had it happened, would
have answered the food-movements chant: People have a right to
health-giving food! Secondarily, it would have held people and companies
to their advertising, labels and agreements so that we can identify
clean food free from industrial chemicals, including GMO, for our health
needs.
More evidence that came later showed that Victoria Bloch was involved in
the food-fraud. Considering that she is a Chapter Leader in Los Angeles
for an important foundation that rallies against soy and GMO corn, the
solid evidence that she knowingly sold soy and GMO corn-fed products as
if they were beyond organic without soy or GMO corn at farmers' markets
for lots of profit is a staggering revelation.
Government could care less about our food-rights and did nothing to the
James, Sharon and Victoria (3some) regarding their proved acts of
food-fraud. Authorities even have a forged farm title deed in Sharon
Palmer's name that she used to acquire money from investors to buy her
farm Healthy Family Farm.
She is a two-time convicted felon for scamming elderly people out of
their homes and livelihood and banks in reverse-mortgage schemes for
millions of dollars by forging deeds in the same manner. What is telling
in the face of her pleas that her ex-husband was the criminal in the
mortgage schemes, some same forgery fraud with her name on the farm deed
is the same as occurred with the mortgage schemes. Did her ex-husband
forge the farm mortgage deed, too? Of course, not.
Since all judges work for governments and governments have proved to
violate every Constitutionally protected right in their power-grabs, I
can only surmise that Judge Green was ordered to make certain that my
case against Palmer and Stewart did not go according to legal
procedures. Either they wanted me to suffer great losses in any way in
which they could effect them, or they are protecting Sharon for
clandestine reasons for the same intent.
Green's first corrupt act was to allow Palmer over one year to answer my
complaint. If Judge Green had followed proper legal procedure, the case
would have gone into default at least 2 times. Green's next violation,
even though all of my claims were based on contracts and numerous
testimonies, he had no legal grounds to dismiss any of my causes of
actions. However, he dismissed 14 leaving only the 2 for conversion.
However, he allowed Palmer to cross-sue me for the causes of actions of
mine that he dismissed. Hello?
The result of that was that my attorney would have to file an appeal
once the case finished in Green's courtroom. Two years had already
passed. Appeals take years and only a few are accepted yearly although
many more are worthy. Regardless, I paid the court through my attorney
for the appeal in advance.
I spent 4 weeks preparing for the trial, about $20,000 to ensure that
important witnesses from as far as Bali Indonesia were here prepared to
testify. Although Green had dismiss the jury trial, the court calendar
stated the trial was by jury so, I thought the judge had changed his
mind. However, when I arrived for trial, he refused a jury.
Since it was a civil trial, I was told jury trials are not guaranteed. I
do not know whether that is true or not and will investigate that issue
when I have time. If anyone has any precedence in law on that, please
send it to me.
This case against Sharon and James was worse than Vernon Hershberger's
case at times. The last voice that rang in that unjust courtroom before
I left the room, besides the judge's voice, was mine when I said to the
judge, "Your honor, I came here for your help to get justice but you
have done nothing but undermined this case from the beginning". I was
saddened, sickened and angered at the no-jury decision.
The trail was aborted, over, but not completely.
I decided that I would convene the major whistleblower witnesses at my
attorneys offices and video their testimonies separately. I accomplished
that. Now, someone plans to post that information within 6 weeks on the
internet. You will be able to decide from the evidence how guilty the
3some are.
The 3some peddled commercial food to people using my Right To Choose
Healthy Food MEMBERSHIP CONTRACTS stating my quality of beyond-organic
food. Isn't that criminal and shameful? The betrayal to our plight for
the best of health is so outrageous. Since the government will not allow
me to have justice in their courts, we will take it to the people.
You will get to decide if Sharon, James and Victoria put people's health
at risk for profit? According to solid evidence, even the foods that
Sharon produced at HFF were the same commercial quality that she bought
and sold according to eyewitnesses and the labels on the feed she
ordered, purchased and fed her animals repeatedly and exclusively.
For Sharon to all of a sudden say that she never claimed organic and for
James Stewart to lie and agree with her is outrageous fabrication. Do
they think they can change history by spouting and repeating fabrications?
To how many of you did I suggest that you consume lots of organic eggs
and chicken from Rawesome and you purchased HFF products because you
were told they were organic or beyond with no soy or GMO? How many of us
were harmed?
Sharon and her minions have posted their rewrite of history but the
testimony of many will give the real version. They are protecting each
other and seem to be getting away with it. Will you let them?
There is one more factor to consider. We all know that many felons
reduce their sentences and get protection from other charges by becoming
pawns and tools for government agents. We should consider that Sharon
was one of them. Some of that evidence is below for those who are
interested in how low governmental corruption will stoop to impose on
our lives and natural rights, our ability to get the health-giving foods
we need.
I wish for all of you a happy and healthy week.
appreciatively,
aajonus
As I stated in an email 4 weeks ago, I need your donations to continue
my work to fight for everyone's' food-freedom and food-quality. Very few
of you came to support us at the trial; that was truly heartbreaking.
Please donate. Thank you to those few who donated. Please help me help
you by donating to:
Right To Choose Healthy Food, Charitable Trust
POB 176
Santa Monica, CA 90406-0176
There are others fighting for your rights besides me and they, too, need
our support, however most of them are ralliers but not movers and
shakers. Sally Fallon and Farmers To Consumers Legal Defense Fund are
movers and shakers and have been for about 1 decade. They helped Vernon
Hershberger and Alvin Schlangen defend my food-contracts and win.
*****************
LOOKING AT THE REASONS SHARON GOT INVOLVED IN RAWESOME AND WORKING AS AN
AGENT OR PAWN FOR GOVERNMENTS TO DESTROY RAWESOME AND OUR FOOD CLUB;
ULTIMATELY TO DESTROY OUR FOOD RIGHTS:
In that book I mentioned above, the author of whom I think is a
government pawn or agent also, alleges that government is working hard
to divide us, employing all sorts of tactics including monitoring me,
including my emails.
Is it probable that government agencies/agents used Sharon Palmer to
divide us by patronizing and trapping James Stewart? It certainly looks
that way. However, evidence shows that James Stewart made a decision at
sometime to knowingly betray all of the members at Rawesome and lie
about the quality of food from Sharon and HFF.
The fact that Sharon spent very little time in prison for her felony
convictions for her and her ex-husband's stealing millions of dollars
(estimates are about $13 millions; banks refuse to tell) from elderly
people, leaving them homeless in reverse-mortgages scams, and that she
did not pay much restitution, if any, is puzzling. Who made that happen?
Are we going to attribute that to an over-sympathetic judge who was
wooed by Sharon's beauty and charm?
The charges for such crimes would have had most criminals serving at
least 4 years for each count. Did government agencies offer her a deal
she could not refuse? Did governmental agents recruit her to end
Rawesome and help destroy the cohesive food-freedom movement in Los Angeles?
HER PLAN AND METHOD:
Does Sharon Palmer's history and criminal record show she liked
quick-money-making endeavors or hard-working ones? She was an office
woman. Why did Sharon Palmer all of a sudden become an "organic" farmer
but do nothing organic? Why is she being protected from so many crimes
by governments?
Consider that husbandry-farming is a profession that takes no less than
7 hard years to profit with considerable financial investment, including
thousands of acres of grazing land. Sharon and the farm-dreamers only
had 5 manageable acres. Was it reasonable that Sharon promised all
investors and James that she would have all investors paid with
substantial interest within one year with a profit from the farm?
Why in the world would she choose farming to make a bundle in one year,
when no one has ever made a meager profit from farming in less than 5
years? She told investors she could do it in one year. Yes, she claimed
she had a windfall sum coming her way but it did not come in one year
and it did not pay off all of her debts.
SHE COULD NOT HAVE MADE HER WAY INTO RAWESOME WITHOUT PROMISE OF
ORGANIC-QUALITY FOOD.
There is not one thread of tangible evidence that proves she ever did
anything organic at the farm, not even with her goats? She never bought
an organic animal. There is no evidence trail, including paper to any
organic origin. Those of you who visited and toured the farm know that
she claimed everything on her farm was organic. There is no way that she
could have made her way into Rawesome without her claiming organic.
Now, the 3some claim that Sharon never stated she was organic and never
claimed to be organic. Contrary to her claims, she gave and used RTCHF
membership agreements at farmers' markets identifying the beyond-organic
quality of food. I personally can attest that they are lying and are
criminals who violated our trust and health.
We have eye-witness testimonies from 5 intelligent sources that all of
the animals she bought from 2008 onward were not organic. Two
eye-witnesses testified that one batch of hundreds of chicks were so
sickly that 1/3 died in the first week. There is plenty of evidence that
Sharon bought and sold commercial food weekly, that her patrons were
farmers' market buyers and Right To Choose Healthy Food members, and
that she claimed it was all grown at her HFF beyond organically.
More evidence that would support the notion that Sharon could be with
the governmental conspiracy to divide us is that governments hold the
forged deed that she made to raise funds to gain the farm mainly from
club-member investors. Why didn't the Los Angeles DA prosecute her for
that very serious felony violation? Because she is working with
governmental agencies in this arena?
Los Angeles City and County District attorneys gave Sharon and Victoria
slaps-on-the-hand-misdemeanor convictions for selling unlicensed food
and let them go on almost 30 felony counts. How is that possible?
Since Los Angeles County uses vast resources to convict misdemeanor
shoplifters, why didn't it charge Sharon for the felony forged deed? Are
they protecting her? Sure tastes like it.
How did Sharon maker her way into James and Rawesome? Was James an easy
mark for her because James trusted many of the wrong people, had a big
unrealistic heart, little backbone for sacrifice, easily provoked, and
lacked common sense when it came to Sharon's unrealistic farm idea?
Why did Sharon get involved with Victoria Bloch? How is it that Sharon,
having no interest in organic and buying her food at regular commercial
markets, ended up at a Weston A. Price Foundation meeting that is about
quality organic food and met Victoria? Could Sharon have marked her
because Victoria was affiliated with the a notable foundation that
rallies for the clean-food without soy or GMO-stuff movement and was an
easy mark?
Wouldn't taking-down Victoria in a food scandal involving soy and GMO
corn (the very products that the foundation publicly criticizes
regularly) be a great blow to the food-rights movement? But Victoria
would have to be a willing seller of soy and corn-based product.
According to 2 independent witnesses, Victoria was and did.
How was Sharon able to so easily escape my lawsuit and trial by Judge
Green violating proper procedures? It seems that she would have to have
some intricate connection with government.
However this played, are we going to let all of the confusion distract
us from fighting for food-freedom, our right to choose healthy food?
