you know i have conversations on this subject matter with a friend from time to time, in every time the key issue we seem to disagree on, is the notion that people can be 'turned' gay, either through propaganda, hormonal tinkering through food, or both. he seems to believe that people are just born gay, and/or the people that simply choose to act "camp" or "flamboyant" or whatever you want to say, are just doing so because it is "enlightening" or "progressive" or whatever. he is quite a bit more liberal than i am, although not beyond all logic
while i would agree with him that maybe a very small percentage of human population could be born gay, ie with gender switched minds ( and these sorts of people are generally the kind of people that you would never guess are gay, and are generally cool, understanding people)...the vast majority of the homosexual community we see today are just confused, hormonally messed up unstable people. propaganda on subject populations is very powerful, and its nothing new as anybody that has lived to witness the difference between the German Reich and the Weimar Republic would tell you (i'm not that old, but lets just say homosexualality and all around depravity, as well as drug use and std's, skyrocketed in the weimar times). let alone the effects adverse foods/poisons can have on hormones. actually the connections are evident through the last few thousand year hisotory of civilizations ie the more materialistic/depraved/currupt civilizations are generally the most rampant homosexual and socially confused, while the more natural tribal settings of people, homosexuality is generally unheard off. compare the depravity in the latter stages of the Roman Empire for instance, with the tribal lifestyles of Germania, and anybody should be able to note the difference. the connections are evident: the more greedy, currupt, and depraved a society, the rise in homosexuality, "modern art", pornography, std's, drug use, and all around social decay
as to overpopulation, while there is much i could say about it and the notion of artificial overpopulation, and what it means (ie the more resilient groups of people being bred out in favor of the easier to control slave masses, do to internationalist social policies), it is important to remember that without the artificial enabling of such overpopulation, the world population would regulate itself rather nicely, in the natural way. we'l see what happens, ie whether or not these artificial overpopulation methods can continue to hold off of the will of nature
