Perhaps you have missed the point of this whole thread, which is that the Neanderthal were not wiped out, rather they interbred with later branches of the Homo family tree.
Is that directed to me? I not only don't believe that Neanderthals were all wiped out, I got my DNA tested and thus
know I have Neanderthal DNA, which I reported before, and think it's quite cool. I don't know of anyone who thinks that Neanderthal DNA doesn't exist in some humans today. Please don't try to tie me to that outdated nonsensical notion. I have all of the above noted Neanderthal tendencies to varying degrees (which I also reported before), including a somewhat flared ribcage, so I was a bit surprised that the number wasn't higher, but it was higher than avg for Europeans and I suspect that the real impact of Neanderthal DNA is higher than so far reported.
I also have a brother-in-law who is descended from one of the known Neanderthal valleys and he also has some Neanderthal characteristics, such as the flared ribcage. I certainly do not consider him stupid or ugly.
Neanderthals were not only not stupid, their brains were larger than today's world average and I strongly suspect that they were
more intelligent than today's avg, not less. The above Neanderthal traits don't suggest ugliness or stupidness to me (granted, I may be biased on that LOL). Whether they suggest to others is up to them and doesn't constrain my own opinions. I don't have to share the opinions of others and their opinions are not proof. Of course, libtards claim that brainsize has nothing to do with intelligence, but they contradictorily only make that claim about humans, and not other species. Evidence has also been found of Neanderthal culture, which they were previously claimed not to have, which was a foolish assumption.
In fact, no humans have been found with a 100% Neanderthal DNA sequence, which would be unlikely anyway under the interbreeding scenario.
OK, If not 100%, then what rough % would you guess? I'm just curious. It sounds like you and Tyler think the real % is higher than what my test showed, but for some reason you're being coy about what the real figure is. I too think it's actually higher, or at least more impactful, than usually discussed, but almost none of the scientists give higher figures, even those who say they think that the real number or impact is higher. It's as though people are afraid to share their analyses and hypotheses on the topic. I have little idea myself, beyond that the usual figures seem too low to me, so I'm seeking info.
I actually got interested in Neanderthal DNA quite a number of years ago, when I learned that people in a French village were found to share DNA with Neanderthal skeletons that had been excavated in the same valley. I think it was in the days before the World Wide Web was widely available, and I since haven't been able to find a record of that research. If anyone has anything on it, I'd appreciate it if you'd share it. It's strange how all trace of it just seems to have disappeared.