Fact : The videos shown on global TV 09/11/2001 were faked, not real.

[goodsamaritan]

Fact : The videos shown on global TV 09/11/2001 were faked, not real.

Does that itself mean no planes ever flew into the buildings? No.

It does mean that no planes flew into the building at the precise moment that the videos showed.
---

It is 2014... some 13 years after the event. 
No need for emotions over this PAST event analysis.
It is what it is.
With 2014 PC technology, every teenager who edits home movies will recognize the fakery.

---

The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations.

This documentary is (c) by Colin Alexander & Ace Baker

This is something like "Magic's Biggest Secrets Finally Revealed"... tell all show all.  They are not fooling the next generation of video editing savvy people.

9 11 NO PLANES Theory Undeniable Proof!! 2013

You need to watch this 45 min expose before you can comment.

[nummi]

It is undeniable there were used bombs, that it was, at least partly, a controlled demolition. It is extremely likely something flew into those buildings, but not in any way were those planes of any kind. It is undeniable that the speed at which they flew was much higher than is possible for planes of that size at that altitude, it is simply impossible. Could have been small drones, and very likely that's exactly what they were.
If they were drones how could they look like planes? Holograms. Something that is possible as well. We do have that technology, have definitely had it for decades, just not for the public and not in public knowledge.

In a video a plane's wing vanishes for a short period. Could be because of poor video editing/creating, or it could be due to a fault in hologram projection.
Was there used thermite? Well, why not? There are signs of its use.
Also beneath the rubble pools of bright liquid, like magma, of such temperatures that melt firefighters titanium foot gear.

If you look at some videos of the collapse itself then you can easily notice that the metal grid, the bone-structure, simply goes to dust. Now how can that happen to metal? It cannot, unless advanced knowledge and technology - energy weapons, or nano technology or similar.
There were also pieces of metal that were bent, without it being possible according to public knowledge of "physics".
There are reports of people being lifted up into the air and flewn a distance.

If you look at controlled demolition videos and the amount of rubble afterward... where's the rubble from those two towers??? Even the third building there produced more rubble... It literally seems like the towers were mostly rendered to dust. It is clearly seen from some videos that the metal grid simply disintegrated to dust, which makes no sense, unless you broaden you view to energy weapons and such (technology that's existed for decades, just kept from public knowledge).

Could it be that the things that flew into the towers were indeed drones, but carrying an energy weapon or something related? And were disguised via a hologram device installed onto them as well? It is possible, and very likely.
Was there video editing on top of all the rest? Of course.

Usually when investigating something, the very first explanation is accepted and the rest discarded. It's like people are conditioned to only accept one scenario out of many, as if only one is possible, as if cannot be more than one at a time, even if there is clear evidence for more than one. It was a demolition - there were bombs, there was used thermite - possibly the molten pools that melt titanium, metal grid did turn to dust - energy weapons, very possibly and likely something did fly into those buildings, but not planes - drones equipped with hologram projectors and energy weapons.
So when people begin investigating they are immediately confused, because there's evidence to so many versions, but they only expect one to be true. The purpose was to confuse people, which worked well. The people who are behind this scam know what they are doing, they know how people's minds work, they know what the real reality is like, but they don't want us to find out - they need us blind, dumb, and sick, and enslaved, for whatever twisted purposes.

Al Qaeda is a database of, primarily, muslim people who were trained, taught, and brainwashed by CIA (by USA) to be blamed for false flag events that are created by the US (and allies, all of whom are controlled by the few ancient families) in the first place.

The authority's solution? Terrorism, lets go kill "terrorists" aka millions of innocent people. And then when a soldier dies it's suddenly a big deal all over the mass media... of how a few hundred or few thousand soldiers died - a big fucking deal... How about all those millions killed deliberately?!? How about the destroyed food manufacturing buildings, the plantations? On top of the deliberate killing of innocents now they are literally starving to death as well. The same was in Vietnam, exactly the same.


Some "MUST SEE!" stuff. Not restricted to 9/11 scam. Point is not to blindly believe what is told in these, the point is to think it over, do more research if don't immediately understand, and decide for oneself. Truth about true reality does not come immediately, it comes over an extended period and in many waves, especially because we (our minds) are so disconnected from it.
Esoteric Agenda - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArPXwkwQMP4
Water - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itloBORPrag
Thrive - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEV5AFFcZ-s
Ancient Hidden Technology - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlOR0q2KKSY
Paradise or Oblivion - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KphWsnhZ4Ag
Forbidden Cancer Cures - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWLrfNJICeM
Who Killed the Electric Car - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTHsTCBxDM8 (For some absolutely idiotic reason it is in 8 pieces. Probably to annoy people and keep them from viewing it.)
The Light Bulb Conspiracy - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViI6uAxqEOY
Propaganda - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NMr2VrhmFI (A North-Korean take on western world. It was rather surprising to me... spot on with almost everything.)
The War You Don't See - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykEHuUTYqso&feature=kp
Wake Up Call - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yT1GavDtiwM
John Hutchison - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vO-1l0lXR_U
Judy Wood video - http://www.drjudywood.com/
Dot Connector, David Icke - http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/david-icke-dot-connector-series-on-the-peoples-voice-best-watched-in-order-for-most-effect/
Alex Jones movies as well.
There are many more.

As well I would recommend reading what's in these:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11442
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10928

[CatTreats]

Watched the whole video. I always had my suspicions, of course they only grew the more I realized how corrupt the government is. I was only 7 or 8 when 9/11 happened, so I didn't know anything. I just believed it. Even if I already basically knew this was true, it's still haunting to watch. I had never really stopped to think about 9/11 that deeply actually.

I guess the only real question I would have is if there is any person out there who personally witnessed the planes. At the end, you can definitely get the controversy from the public. Those people were saying "no they were bombs" and "I never saw a plane" etc. I just wonder if there is someone who can say they saw the planes. Considering there were thousands of people out there at that moment. Someone had to have seen them if they were indeed there. That would be the only possible argument against something like this.

[Projectile Vomit]

Maybe.

It's common knowledge among law enforcement officers, attorneys and first responders that people faced with trauma are incredibly suggestible. Police officers are trained to question people in particular ways so as to not incidentally lead them to make erroneous statements. Lawyers are well known to use leading questions to discredit witnesses.

The psychology behind questioning could be used to deliberately lead people to make particular statements, including to acquiesce to having seen planes hit buildings when, in fact, the person may not have seen a plane at all. And once a person repeats a story a few times, even one they were coerced to tell, their brain will fill details in so that their memories will match what others want them to have experienced. It takes an extraordinarily strong-willed person to overcome this sort of thing and pierce through to the reality of their experience.

[CatTreats]

It's common knowledge among law enforcement officers, attorneys and first responders that people faced with trauma are incredibly suggestible. Police officers are trained to question people in particular ways so as to not incidentally lead them to make particular statements. Lawyers are well known to use leading questions to discredit witnesses.

The psychology behind questioning could be used to deliberately lead people to make particular statements, including to acquiesce to having seen planes hit buildings when, in fact, the person may not have seen a plane at all. And once a person repeats a story a few times, even one they were coerced to tell, their brain will fill details in so that their memories will match what others want them to have experienced. It takes an extraordinarily strong-willed person to overcome this sort of thing and pierce through to the reality of their experience.

Actually, this sounds pretty spot on.

[goodsamaritan]

Even if there were planes or missiles or UFOs... that hit... those were not the ones on these FAKE videos propagated US wide and worldwide.  In the fake videos they even dubbed in sound effects.

Younger people should watch "Wag the Dog" movie starring Robert de Niro and Dustin Hoffman

WAG THE DOG - Trailer - (1997) - HQ

When I was in high school in 1984, our teachers assigned the book 1984 by George Orwell and drilled into us these concepts to make sure our batch of students understood really well what was going on around us.